Zalewski C, Archer R P
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1991 Jun;179(6):338-45. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199106000-00006.
This review examines the literature on assessing borderline personality disorder (BPD) using the MMPI and the Rorschach test. Despite the extensive use of these instruments in the assessment of BPD, the degree to which they are successful in identifying the disorder remains unclear. Methodological difficulties in this literature are discussed, including diagnostic and sample heterogeneity, base rate issues, systematic differences in selection criteria among studies, and, for the Rorschach, differing outcome measures. Both MMPI and Rorschach findings suggest a general trend for borderline groups to produce relatively unique findings. Their usefulness in yielding accurate individual diagnoses of BPD, however, has not yet been established. Furthermore, no supportive evidence was found for the commonly held hypothesis that BPD subjects show more impairment on unstructured measures than on objective measures.
本综述考察了使用明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)和罗夏墨迹测验评估边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的相关文献。尽管这些工具在BPD评估中被广泛使用,但它们在识别该障碍方面的成功程度仍不明确。本文讨论了该文献中的方法学难题,包括诊断和样本异质性、基础率问题、各研究间选择标准的系统差异,以及对于罗夏墨迹测验而言,不同的结果测量方法。MMPI和罗夏墨迹测验的研究结果均表明边缘型群体呈现相对独特结果的总体趋势。然而,它们在准确做出BPD个体诊断方面的效用尚未得到证实。此外,对于普遍持有的假设,即BPD患者在非结构化测量上比在客观测量上表现出更多损害,未找到支持性证据。