Cecatti José Guilherme, Guerra Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins, Sousa Maria Helena de, Menezes Greice Maria de Souza
Departamento de Tocoginecologia da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP - Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010 Mar;32(3):105-11. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032010000300002.
To evaluate the prevalence of spontaneous and induced abortion reported by a sample of Brazilian women interviewed in the National Demographic Health Survey of 1996.
This was a secondary analysis of the Brazilian DHS-96 database, with information from interviews with a representative sample of 12,612 women about their reproductive life, focusing on the prevalence of spontaneous and induced abortion in the last five years and the associated factors for the various regions of the country and for Brazil as a whole. The sampling method was implemented with a strategy selection in two stages, one for the households and the other for women. The prevalence of spontaneous and induced abortion was estimated for Brazil and regions, and the socio-demographic characteristics of the women were analyzed as a function of the abortion's experience. A multinomial regression model analysis was used for the identification of factors independently associated with both types of abortion; their OR and respective 95% CI are reported.
The prevalence of reported spontaneous abortion was 14% and the prevalence of induced abortion was 2.4% for the country as a whole. The state with the highest prevalence of induced abortion was Rio de Janeiro with 6.5%, followed by the Northeast region with 3.1%. The places with the lowest prevalence were the state of São Paulo and the South region. Both spontaneous and induced abortion showed higher prevalences with increasing age of the women studied. Being from the urban area (OR=1.5; 95%CI=1.0-2.3), having had more than one live child (OR=2.2; 95%CI=1.5-3.2) and being non-white (OR=1.4; 95%CI=1.0-1.8) were the main risk factors for induced abortion.
The non-modifiable risk factors for induced abortion identified in this study indicate the need for improvement of educational and contraceptive actions, with priority for these specific demographic groups.
评估在1996年全国人口健康调查中接受访谈的巴西女性样本报告的自然流产和人工流产发生率。
这是对巴西1996年人口与健康调查数据库的二次分析,数据来自对12612名具有代表性的女性进行的关于其生殖生活的访谈,重点关注过去五年自然流产和人工流产的发生率以及巴西各地区和整个巴西的相关因素。抽样方法分两个阶段实施,一个阶段针对家庭,另一个阶段针对女性。估计了巴西及各地区自然流产和人工流产的发生率,并分析了女性的社会人口学特征与流产经历的关系。采用多项回归模型分析来确定与两种流产类型独立相关的因素;报告了其比值比(OR)和各自的95%置信区间(CI)。
整个国家报告的自然流产发生率为14%,人工流产发生率为2.4%。人工流产发生率最高的州是里约热内卢,为6.5%,其次是东北地区,为3.1%。发生率最低的地区是圣保罗州和南部地区。自然流产和人工流产的发生率均随所研究女性年龄的增加而升高。来自城市地区(OR=1.5;95%CI=1.0 - 2.3)、生育过一个以上存活子女(OR=2.2;95%CI=1.5 - 3.2)以及非白人(OR=1.4;95%CI=1.0 - 1.8)是人工流产的主要危险因素。
本研究确定的人工流产不可改变的危险因素表明需要改进教育和避孕措施,优先针对这些特定的人口群体。