• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西非意愿妊娠的负担:社会和公共卫生系统成本分析。

The burden of unintended pregnancies in Brazil: a social and public health system cost analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands ; Global Market Access Solutions, Saint-Prex, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2014 Jul 16;6:663-70. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S61543. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S61543
PMID:25075201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4106956/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unintended pregnancy (UP) is an unmet medical need with consequences worldwide. We evaluate the costs of UP based on pregnancies in Brazil from for the year 2010.

METHODS

The consequences of UP were evaluated using decision analysis based on pregnancy rates and outcomes as miscarriage, induced abortion, and live birth, which were factored into the analysis. The model discriminated between maternal and child outcomes and accounted for costs (in Brazilian currency [Real$, R$]) within the Brazilian public health service attributed to preterm birth, neonatal admission, cerebral palsy, and neonatal and maternal mortality. Event probabilities were obtained from local resources.

RESULTS

We estimate that 1.8 million UPs resulted in 159,151 miscarriages, 48,769 induced abortions, 1.58 million live births, and 312 maternal deaths, including ten (3%) attributed to unsafe abortions. The total estimated costs attributed to UP are R$4.1 billion annually, including R$32 million (0.8%) and R$4.07 billion (99.2%) attributed to miscarriages and births and complications, respectively. Direct birth costs accounted for approximately R$1.22 billion (30.0%), with labor and delivery responsible for most costs (R$988 million; 24.3%) for the year 2010. The remainder of costs were for infant complications (R$2.84 billion; 72.3%) with hospital readmission during the first year accounting for approximately R$2.15 billion (52.9%). Based on the national cost, we estimate the cost per UP to be R$2,293.

CONCLUSION

Despite weaknesses in precise estimates in annual pregnancies and induced abortions, our estimates reflect the costs of UP for different pregnancy outcomes. The main costs associated with UP are in those carried to parturition. The health cost of abortion represents a small proportion of total costs as these are paid for outside of the public health system. Consequently, reductions in UP will generate not only cost savings, but reductions in woman and child morbidity and mortality.

摘要

背景

非意愿妊娠(UP)是一种未满足的医疗需求,在全球范围内造成了各种后果。我们评估了 2010 年巴西妊娠相关 UP 的成本。

方法

基于妊娠率和妊娠结局(如流产、人工流产和活产),采用决策分析评估 UP 的后果。该模型区分了母婴结局,并考虑了早产、新生儿入院、脑瘫以及新生儿和产妇死亡等归因于 UP 的巴西公共卫生服务成本(巴西雷亚尔[Real$,R$])。事件概率来自当地资源。

结果

我们估计有 180 万例 UP 导致 159151 例流产、48769 例人工流产、158 万例活产和 312 例产妇死亡,其中 10 例(3%)归因于不安全流产。每年归因于 UP 的总估计成本为 41 亿雷亚尔,其中流产和活产及并发症分别占 3200 万雷亚尔(0.8%)和 40.7 亿雷亚尔(99.2%)。直接分娩费用约为 12.2 亿雷亚尔(30.0%),其中分娩费用占大部分(9.88 亿雷亚尔;24.3%)。其余费用用于婴儿并发症(28.4 亿雷亚尔;72.3%),其中第一年的医院再次入院费用约为 21.5 亿雷亚尔(52.9%)。基于国家成本,我们估计每例 UP 的成本为 2293 雷亚尔。

结论

尽管每年妊娠和人工流产的精确估计存在一定局限性,但我们的估计反映了不同妊娠结局的 UP 成本。与 UP 相关的主要成本与分娩相关。由于这些费用是在公共卫生系统之外支付的,因此堕胎的健康费用仅占总费用的一小部分。因此,减少 UP 不仅可以节省成本,还可以降低母婴发病率和死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64ce/4106956/5430ad8c7ac5/ijwh-6-663Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64ce/4106956/5430ad8c7ac5/ijwh-6-663Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64ce/4106956/5430ad8c7ac5/ijwh-6-663Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The burden of unintended pregnancies in Brazil: a social and public health system cost analysis.巴西非意愿妊娠的负担:社会和公共卫生系统成本分析。
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Jul 16;6:663-70. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S61543. eCollection 2014.
2
Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning program.投资回报率:对美国公共资助计划生育项目的效益和成本节约情况进行更全面的评估。
Milbank Q. 2014 Dec;92(4):696-749. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12080. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
3
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.公共资助的避孕服务对意外怀孕的影响及其对医疗补助支出的意义。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95.
4
The public costs of births resulting from unintended pregnancies: national and state-level estimates.意外怀孕导致的生育公共成本:国家和州级估计。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Jun;43(2):94-102. doi: 10.1363/4309411. Epub 2011 May 19.
5
Unintended pregnancy and taxpayer spending.意外怀孕与纳税人支出。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Jun;43(2):88-93. doi: 10.1363/4308811. Epub 2011 May 19.
6
The incidence of abortion and unintended pregnancy in India, 2015.2015 年印度堕胎和意外妊娠的发生率。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jan;6(1):e111-e120. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30453-9.
7
Family planning issues relating to maternal and infant mortality in the United States.美国与母婴死亡率相关的计划生育问题。
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1993;27(2):120-34.
8
Unintended pregnancy among American women.美国女性意外怀孕的情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1987 Mar-Apr;19(2):76-7.
9
Unintended pregnancies in England in 2010: costs to the National Health Service (NHS).2010 年英格兰意外怀孕:国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的成本。
Contraception. 2013 Feb;87(2):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
10
Use of gestational surrogates for women with Eisenmenger syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Eisenmenger 综合征患者使用妊娠代孕:成本效益分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Feb;34(4):526-531. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1610734. Epub 2019 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of modern contraceptive methods and pregnancy planning: a cohort study.现代避孕方法的使用与妊娠规划:一项队列研究。
Rev Saude Publica. 2025 Apr 28;59:e14. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006248. eCollection 2025.
2
The association between unintended pregnancy and maternal mental health in rural China.中国农村意外怀孕与孕产妇心理健康之间的关联。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 7;13:1498473. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1498473. eCollection 2025.
3
The economic impact of Long-Acting Contraceptives (LARCs) on public health.长效避孕方法对公共卫生的经济影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception.美国意外怀孕的负担:增加使用长效可逆避孕措施的潜在节省。
Contraception. 2013 Feb;87(2):154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.016. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
2
Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009.美国长效避孕方法使用的变化,2007-2009 年。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):893-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.027. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
3
Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 Feb 19;80:100598. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100598. eCollection 2025.
4
Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy among rural reproductive age women in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚农村育龄妇女意外怀孕的患病率及其决定因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 5;15(1):860. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81067-w.
5
Risk of teratogenicity in continued pregnancy after gestational exposure to mifepristone and/or misoprostol: a systematic review and meta-analysis.米非司酮和/或米索前列醇暴露于妊娠后继续妊娠的致畸风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;310(3):1331-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07616-w. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
6
The Zika virus: an opportunity to revisit reproductive health needs and disparities.寨卡病毒:重新审视生殖健康需求与差距的契机。
Germs. 2022 Dec 31;12(4):519-537. doi: 10.18683/germs.2022.1357. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Brazilian Physicians about Immediate Postpartum and Postabortion Intrauterine Device Insertion.巴西医生对即时产后和流产后宫内节育器放置的知识、态度和实践。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Sep;45(9):e524-e534. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772187. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
8
The role of gender inequality and health expenditure on the coverage of demand for family planning satisfied by modern contraceptives: a multilevel analysis of cross-sectional studies in 14 LAC countries.性别不平等和卫生支出对现代避孕方法满足计划生育需求覆盖率的作用:对14个拉丁美洲和加勒比地区国家横断面研究的多层次分析
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Feb 8;19:100435. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100435. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Impact of COVID-19 on the prescription of contraceptives in a city in São Paulo.COVID-19 对圣保罗市避孕药具处方的影响。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2022 Nov 25;68(12):1765-1768. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220999. eCollection 2022.
10
Contraceptive counseling during the pandemic: practical guidelines.疫情期间的避孕咨询:实用指南
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 Jul;43(7):579-584. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735185. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
长效可逆避孕措施的效果。
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1998-2007. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110855.
4
Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008.人工流产:1995 年至 2008 年全球发生率和趋势。
Lancet. 2012 Feb 18;379(9816):625-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61786-8. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
5
The public costs of births resulting from unintended pregnancies: national and state-level estimates.意外怀孕导致的生育公共成本:国家和州级估计。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Jun;43(2):94-102. doi: 10.1363/4309411. Epub 2011 May 19.
6
Unintended pregnancy and taxpayer spending.意外怀孕与纳税人支出。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Jun;43(2):88-93. doi: 10.1363/4308811. Epub 2011 May 19.
7
Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes.意外怀孕:全球水平、趋势和结果。
Stud Fam Plann. 2010 Dec;41(4):241-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00250.x.
8
Severe maternal morbidity and factors associated with the occurrence of abortion in Brazil.巴西严重孕产妇发病率及与流产发生相关的因素。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Feb;112(2):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.08.013. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
9
Mapping the Timing, Pace, and Scale of the Fertility Transition in Brazil.绘制巴西生育率转变的时间、速度和规模图。
Popul Dev Rev. 2010;36(2):283-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00330.x.
10
[Abortion in Brazil: a demographic approach].[巴西的堕胎情况:一种人口统计学方法]
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010 Mar;32(3):105-11. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032010000300002.