Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):712-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00004.
Experts recommend opioid treatment agreements and urine drug testing to reduce opioid analgesia misuse, but evidence of their effectiveness has not been systematically reviewed.
To synthesize studies of the association of treatment agreements and urine drug testing with opioid misuse outcomes in outpatients with chronic noncancer pain.
MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (January 1966 to June 2009), reference lists, and expert contacts.
Original research addressing opioid medications, chronic pain, and treatment agreements or urine drug testing, with a sample size of 50 participants or more and published in English, Spanish, or French.
Two investigators independently identified eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality. The outcome of opioid misuse was defined as drug abuse, drug misuse, aberrant drug-related behavior, diversion, or addiction.
Of 102 eligible studies, 11 met inclusion criteria; 6 were in pain clinics and 5 were in primary care settings. Four primary care studies examined multicomponent strategies that included interdisciplinary support. All studies were observational and rated as poor to fair quality. In 4 studies with comparison groups, opioid misuse was modestly reduced (7% to 23%) after treatment agreements with or without urine drug testing. In the other 7 studies, the proportion of patients with opioid misuse after treatment agreements, urine drug testing, or both varied widely (3% to 43%).
Diversity of interventions and opioid misuse measures precluded meta-analysis. Most studies evaluated combinations of interventions.
Relatively weak evidence supports the effectiveness of opioid treatment agreements and urine drug testing in reducing opioid misuse by patients with chronic pain. Further research on effective ways to monitor and reduce opioid misuse is needed, especially in primary care settings.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Institute on Drug Abuse, and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
专家建议使用阿片类药物治疗协议和尿液药物检测来减少阿片类镇痛药的滥用,但它们有效性的证据尚未被系统地审查过。
综合研究阿片类药物治疗协议和尿液药物检测与慢性非癌症疼痛门诊患者阿片类药物滥用结果之间的关系。
MEDLINE、PsycINFO、EMBASE、Cochrane 对照临床试验中心注册库(1966 年 1 月至 2009 年 6 月)、参考文献列表和专家联系。
针对阿片类药物、慢性疼痛和治疗协议或尿液药物检测,样本量为 50 名或更多参与者,并以英文、西班牙文或法文发表的原始研究。
两名调查员独立确定了合格的研究,提取了数据并评估了研究质量。阿片类药物滥用的结果定义为药物滥用、药物滥用、异常药物相关行为、药物转移或成瘾。
在 102 项合格的研究中,有 11 项符合纳入标准;6 项在疼痛诊所进行,5 项在初级保健机构进行。4 项初级保健研究检验了包括跨学科支持在内的多组分策略。所有研究均为观察性研究,质量评价为差至中等。在有对照组的 4 项研究中,在使用阿片类药物治疗协议或同时使用阿片类药物治疗协议和尿液药物检测后,阿片类药物滥用的比例适度降低(7%至 23%)。在另外 7 项研究中,使用阿片类药物治疗协议、尿液药物检测或两者都使用后,患者中阿片类药物滥用的比例差异很大(3%至 43%)。
干预措施和阿片类药物滥用措施的多样性使得无法进行荟萃分析。大多数研究评估了干预措施的组合。
相对较弱的证据支持阿片类药物治疗协议和尿液药物检测在减少慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物滥用方面的有效性。需要进一步研究监测和减少阿片类药物滥用的有效方法,特别是在初级保健环境中。
物质滥用和精神健康服务管理局、国家药物滥用研究所和罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会。