Jovanović Gordana
Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, University of Belgrade, Čika Ljubina 18-20, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2010 Dec;44(4):310-28. doi: 10.1007/s12124-010-9132-9.
The conflict between the psychometric methodological framework and the particularities of human experiences reported in psychotherapeutic context led Michael Schwarz to raise the question whether psychology is based on a methodological error. I take this conflict as a heuristic tool for the reconstruction of the early history of psychology, which bears witness to similar epistemological conflicts, though the dominant historiography of psychology has largely forgotten alternative conceptions and their valuable insights into complexities of psychic phenomena. In order to work against the historical amnesia in psychology I suggest to look at cultural-historical contexts which decisively shaped epistemological choices in psychology. Instead of keeping epistemology and history of psychology separate, which nurtures individualism and naturalism in psychology, I argue for historizing epistemology and for historical psychology. From such a historically reflected perspective psychology in contemporary world can be approached more critically.
心理测量方法框架与心理治疗背景下所报告的人类体验的特殊性之间的冲突,促使迈克尔·施瓦茨提出心理学是否基于方法错误这一问题。我将这一冲突视为重构心理学早期历史的启发式工具,这段早期历史见证了类似的认识论冲突,尽管心理学的主流史学很大程度上已遗忘了其他概念及其对心理现象复杂性的宝贵见解。为了对抗心理学中的历史失忆,我建议审视文化历史背景,这些背景决定性地塑造了心理学中的认识论选择。我主张不应将心理学的认识论与历史分开,因为这种分开助长了心理学中的个人主义和自然主义,而应将认识论历史化并倡导历史心理学。从这样一种经过历史反思的视角出发,当代世界的心理学能够得到更批判性的审视。