Toomela Aaro
Department of Special Education, University of Tartu, Salme la, Tartu 50103, Estonia.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Mar;41(1):6-20. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9004-0.
In pre-World-War-II psychology, two directions in methodological thought-the German-Austrian and North American ways-could be differentiated. After the war, the German-Austrian methodological orientation has been largely abandoned. Compared to the pre-WWII German-Austrian psychology, modern mainstream psychology is more concerned with accumulation of facts than with general theory. Furthermore, the focus on qualitative data-in addition to quantitative data-is rarely visible. Only external-physical or statistical-rather than psychological controls are taken into account in empirical studies. Fragments--rather than wholes-and relationships are studied, and single cases that contradict group data are not analyzed. Instead of complex psychological types simple trait differences are studied, and prediction is not followed by thorough analysis of the whole situation. Last (but not least), data are not systematically related to complex theory. These limits have hindered the growth of knowledge in the behavioral sciences. A new return to an updated version of the German-Austrian methodological trajectory is suggested.
在第二次世界大战前的心理学中,可以区分出方法论思想的两个方向——德奥方向和北美方向。战后,德奥方法论取向在很大程度上被摒弃。与二战前的德奥心理学相比,现代主流心理学更关注事实的积累而非一般理论。此外,除了定量数据外,对定性数据的关注也很少见。在实证研究中,只考虑外部物理或统计控制,而不考虑心理控制。研究的是片段而非整体以及关系,与群体数据相矛盾的单个案例也不进行分析。研究的是简单的特质差异而非复杂的心理类型,预测之后也不深入分析整体情况。最后(但同样重要的是),数据与复杂理论没有系统地联系起来。这些局限性阻碍了行为科学知识的增长。有人建议重新回归到德奥方法论轨迹的更新版本。