Kontis Konstantinos
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Dec;58(4):1027-1047. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09829-9. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
This article presents the concept of epistemological alienation in order to examine psychology's epistemological quantitative Paradigm and its connection to political reality. Politzer's work of how mainstream psychology turns the first-person language of the individual into a mechanistic third-person pseudoscience is thoroughly discussed. Consequently, through some marginalized voices within psychology, it is examined how psychologists disregard the subject's own voice, intentionality, meaning and judgment-forming mechanisms promoting instead a naturalistic and mechanistic language, based heavily on psychometric methodology and a false and altered account of psychology's history. Psychology's mechanistic language is compared to Marx's concept of alienation, various aspects of which are discussed. The case is made that epistemological alienation is an internal process in psychological research that stems from and reinforces, essentializes and "epistemologizes" the alienation and the individualization of the modern subject.
本文提出了认识论异化的概念,以审视心理学的认识论量化范式及其与政治现实的联系。文中深入探讨了波利策关于主流心理学如何将个体的第一人称语言转变为机械的第三人称伪科学的研究。因此,通过心理学内部一些边缘化的声音,考察了心理学家如何忽视主体自身的声音、意向性、意义和判断形成机制,转而推崇一种 heavily on psychometric methodology and a false and altered account of psychology's history. 将心理学的机械语言与马克思的异化概念进行了比较,并讨论了其各个方面。文中指出,认识论异化是心理学研究中的一个内在过程,它源于并强化了现代主体的异化和个体化,使其本质化并“认识论化”。 (注:原文中“heavily on psychometric methodology and a false and altered account of psychology's history”部分表述似乎不太完整或准确,可能影响整体理解,但按照要求完整翻译了。)