Suppr超能文献

当不平等成为关键:不平等框架对学术参与的影响。

When inequality matters: the effect of inequality frames on academic engagement.

机构信息

Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jun;98(6):956-66. doi: 10.1037/a0017926.

Abstract

Research indicates that, among women and ethnic minorities, perceived inequality reduces the association between self-esteem and academic outcomes. The present studies demonstrate that the perception of social inequality does not always induce subordinate-group disengagement. Rather, inequality framed as dominant-group advantage allows subordinate groups to remain engaged and causes dominant groups to disengage. Experiments 1-3 demonstrate that academic inequality framed in terms of ingroup disadvantage causes Black, Latino, and female students to disengage, but inequality framed in terms of White or male advantage does not. Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrate the same effect for Whites and men--inequality framed in terms of the ingroup (i.e., advantage) causes disengagement, but inequality framed as outgroup disadvantage does not.

摘要

研究表明,在女性和少数族裔中,感知到的不平等会降低自尊心和学术成果之间的关联。本研究表明,对社会不平等的看法并不总是导致下属群体的脱离。相反,将不平等描述为优势群体的优势,允许下属群体保持参与,而导致优势群体脱离。实验 1-3 表明,以弱势群体劣势为框架的学术不平等会导致黑人和拉丁裔以及女性学生脱离,但以白人和男性优势为框架的不平等则不会。实验 3 和 4 表明了同样的效果对于白人和男性——以群体内部(即优势)为框架的不平等会导致脱离,而以外群体劣势为框架的不平等则不会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验