• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德语翻译和 Radboud 技能问卷在复杂区域疼痛综合征 1 患者中的外部验证。

German translation and external validation of the Radboud Skills Questionnaire in patients suffering from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 1.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rheumatology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jun 1;11:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-107.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-11-107
PMID:20515455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2893083/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome commonly complain of substantial limitations in their activities of daily living. The Radboud Skills Questionnaire measures alterations in the level of disability of patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, but this instrument is currently not available in German. The goals of our study were to translate the Dutch Radboud Skills Questionnaire into German and to assess its external criterion validity with the German version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire.

METHODS

We translated the Radboud Skills Questionnaire according to published guidelines. Demographic data and validity were assessed in 57 consecutive patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 1 of the upper extremity. Information on age, duration of symptoms, type of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 1 and type of initiating event was obtained. We assessed the external criterion validity by comparing the German Radboud Skills Questionnaire and the German Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire and calculated the prediction intervals.

RESULTS

Score values ranged from 55.4 +/- 22.0 for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire score and 140.1 +/- 39.2 for the Radboud Skills Questionnaire. We found a high correlation between the Radboud Skills Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (R2 = 0.83).

CONCLUSION

This validation of the Radboud Skills Questionnaire demonstrates that this German version is a simple and accurate instrument to assess and quantify disabilities of patients suffering from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 1 of the upper extremity for clinical and research purposes.

摘要

背景

患有复杂性区域疼痛综合征的患者通常会抱怨其日常生活活动受到严重限制。Radboud 技能问卷用于测量复杂性区域疼痛综合征患者的残疾程度变化,但目前尚无德语版。我们的研究目的是将荷兰语版 Radboud 技能问卷翻译成德语,并使用德国版上肢残疾问卷评估其外部标准效度。

方法

我们根据已发表的指南翻译了 Radboud 技能问卷。在 57 例上肢复杂性区域疼痛综合征 1 型连续患者中评估了人口统计学数据和有效性。收集了年龄、症状持续时间、复杂性区域疼痛综合征 1 型的类型和起始事件的类型等信息。我们通过比较德国版 Radboud 技能问卷和德国版上肢残疾问卷评估了外部标准效度,并计算了预测区间。

结果

上肢残疾问卷的评分范围为 55.4±22.0,Radboud 技能问卷的评分范围为 140.1±39.2。Radboud 技能问卷与上肢残疾问卷之间存在高度相关性(R2=0.83)。

结论

Radboud 技能问卷的验证表明,德语版 Radboud 技能问卷是一种简单而准确的工具,可用于评估和量化上肢复杂性区域疼痛综合征 1 型患者的残疾程度,适用于临床和研究目的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae97/2893083/5ee63efc17e4/1471-2474-11-107-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae97/2893083/814f770be37f/1471-2474-11-107-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae97/2893083/5ee63efc17e4/1471-2474-11-107-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae97/2893083/814f770be37f/1471-2474-11-107-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae97/2893083/5ee63efc17e4/1471-2474-11-107-2.jpg

相似文献

1
German translation and external validation of the Radboud Skills Questionnaire in patients suffering from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 1.德语翻译和 Radboud 技能问卷在复杂区域疼痛综合征 1 患者中的外部验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jun 1;11:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-107.
2
Translating the Dutch Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires into German and assessing their concurrent validity with VAS measures of pain and activities in daily living.将荷兰步行梯、步行能力和起立坐下问卷翻译成德语,并评估其与 VAS 疼痛测量和日常生活活动的同时效度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jun 1;11:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-108.
3
Validation of a German version of the 'Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand' questionnaire (DASH-G).《手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍》问卷德文版(DASH-G)的验证
Z Rheumatol. 2003 Apr;62(2):168-77. doi: 10.1007/s00393-003-0461-7.
4
Correlation between a novel upper limb activity monitor and four other instruments to determine functioning in upper limb complex regional pain syndrome type I.一种新型上肢活动监测仪与其他四种仪器之间的相关性,以确定Ⅰ型上肢复杂性区域疼痛综合征的功能状态。
J Rehabil Med. 2005 Mar;37(2):108-14. doi: 10.1080/16501970410022093.
5
Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.《手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷》挪威语版本在肩部撞击综合征患者中的信度和效度
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 12;15:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-78.
6
[Standardisation and validation of the German version 2.0 of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder,Hand (DASH) questionnaire].《上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷德语版2.0的标准化与验证》
Unfallchirurg. 2003 Jan;106(1):13-9. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0456-x.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).德国肩部疼痛与功能障碍指数(SPADI)的跨文化适应性、信度和效度
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Jan;46(1):87-92. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel040. Epub 2006 May 23.
8
Reliability and validity of the Greek shoulder pain and disability index in patients with shoulder pain.希腊肩关节疼痛和残疾指数在肩关节疼痛患者中的可靠性和有效性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 May;42(9):1299-1304. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1519728. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Oxford shoulder score.韩国版牛津肩部评分的跨文化调适与验证。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Jan;132(1):93-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1393-3. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
10
Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (Thai SPADI).泰语版肩部疼痛与功能障碍指数(Thai SPADI)的信度和效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Sep 4;13:136. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0333-2.

引用本文的文献

1
An international study to explore the feasibility of collecting standardised outcome data for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: recommendations for an international clinical research registry.一项探索为复杂性区域疼痛综合征收集标准化结局数据可行性的国际研究:关于国际临床研究注册库的建议
Br J Pain. 2023 Oct;17(5):468-478. doi: 10.1177/20494637231188333. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Practical Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines, 5th Edition.复杂性区域疼痛综合征:实用诊断与治疗指南,第 5 版。
Pain Med. 2022 Jun 10;23(Suppl 1):S1-S53. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac046.
3
[External validity of pain-linked functional interference: are we measuring what we want to measure?].

本文引用的文献

1
Complex regional pain syndrome 1--the Swiss cohort study.复杂性区域疼痛综合征1型——瑞士队列研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Jun 23;9:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-92.
2
Reliability of the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire to assess patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.用于评估慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的生活满意度问卷的可靠性。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2008 Jun;31(2):181-3. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0fdf.
3
[Reliability and responsiveness of the German version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH)].
[疼痛相关功能干扰的外部效度:我们所测量的是我们想要测量的吗?]
Schmerz. 2012 Aug;26(4):396-401. doi: 10.1007/s00482-012-1154-4.
[《手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷》(DASH)德文版的信度与反应度]
Unfallchirurg. 2007 Jun;110(6):548-52. doi: 10.1007/s00113-007-1235-5.
4
Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation.患者报告结局(PRO)测量指标翻译与文化调适过程的良好实践原则:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)翻译与文化调适特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):94-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.
5
Correlation between a novel upper limb activity monitor and four other instruments to determine functioning in upper limb complex regional pain syndrome type I.一种新型上肢活动监测仪与其他四种仪器之间的相关性,以确定Ⅰ型上肢复杂性区域疼痛综合征的功能状态。
J Rehabil Med. 2005 Mar;37(2):108-14. doi: 10.1080/16501970410022093.
6
Complex regional pain syndrome: are there distinct subtypes and sequential stages of the syndrome?复杂性区域疼痛综合征:该综合征是否存在不同的亚型和连续阶段?
Pain. 2002 Jan;95(1-2):119-24. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00387-6.
7
The Radboud skills questionnaire: construction and reliability in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy of one upper extremity.
Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Mar 20;22(5):233-45. doi: 10.1080/096382800296809.
8
Towards a new ICIDH. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps.迈向新的《国际损伤、残疾和残障分类》(ICIDH)。
Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Feb 15;22(3):144-56. doi: 10.1080/096382800297006.
9
External validation of IASP diagnostic criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and proposed research diagnostic criteria. International Association for the Study of Pain.国际疼痛研究协会制定的复杂性区域疼痛综合征的国际疼痛研究协会(IASP)诊断标准及拟议的研究诊断标准的外部验证。
Pain. 1999 May;81(1-2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00011-1.
10
Generic and specific measurement of health-related quality of life in a clinical trial of respiratory rehabilitation.呼吸康复临床试验中健康相关生活质量的通用和特定测量
J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Mar;52(3):187-92. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00157-7.