Suppr超能文献

《手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷》挪威语版本在肩部撞击综合征患者中的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

作者信息

Haldorsen Benjamin, Svege Ida, Roe Yngve, Bergland Astrid

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Martina Hansens Hospital, Pb 823, 1346 Sandvika, Bærum, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 12;15:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-78.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) are an important part of clinical decision-making in rehabilitation of patients with shoulder pain. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was designed to measure physical disability and symptoms in patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity and is one the most commonly used outcome measures for patients with shoulder pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the DASH in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome at an orthopaedic outpatient clinic were included in the study. Internal consistency of the DASH was evaluated by the Cronbach's alpha and item-to-total correlations. Test-retest reliability was analyzed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement (LoA) according to the Bland Altman method. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimally detectable change (MDC) were calculated for the total DASH score. Construct validity was evaluated by testing six a priori hypotheses for the Pearson's correlation coefficient between the DASH and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).

RESULTS

Reliability: Cronbach's alpha of the DASH was 0.93 and item-to-total correlations ranged from 0.36 to 0.81. ICC was 0.89. The 95 percent LoA was calculated to be between -11.9 and 14.1. SEM was 4.7 and MDC 13.1. Construct validity: Eighty-three percent of the a priori hypotheses of correlation were confirmed. The DASH showed a high positive correlation of 0.75 with the SPADI, a negative moderate correlation of -0.48 to -0.62 with physical functioning, bodily pain and physical component summary of the SF-36 and a moderate positive correlation of 0.58 with the NPRS. DASH correlated higher with the physical component summary than with the mental component summary of the SF-36.

CONCLUSIONS

The Norwegian version of the DASH is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

摘要

背景

患者自评结局指标(PROMs)是肩痛患者康复临床决策的重要组成部分。上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷旨在测量上肢肌肉骨骼疾病患者的身体功能障碍和症状,是肩痛患者最常用的结局指标之一。本研究的目的是调查挪威语版DASH在肩峰撞击综合征患者中的信度和效度。

方法

本研究纳入了63例在骨科门诊被诊断为肩峰撞击综合征的患者。通过Cronbach's α系数和项目与总分相关性评估DASH的内部一致性。根据Bland Altman方法,采用组内相关系数(ICC)和一致性界限(LoA)分析重测信度。计算DASH总分的测量标准误(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC)。通过检验6个关于DASH与肩痛及功能障碍指数(SPADI)、36项简短健康调查(SF-36)和数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)之间Pearson相关系数的先验假设,评估结构效度。

结果

信度:DASH的Cronbach's α系数为0.93,项目与总分相关性范围为0.36至0.81。ICC为0.89。计算得出95%的LoA在-11.9至14.1之间。SEM为4.7,MDC为13.1。结构效度:83%的先验相关假设得到证实。DASH与SPADI呈高度正相关(0.75),与SF-36的身体功能、身体疼痛和身体成分总结呈中度负相关(-0.48至-0.62),与NPRS呈中度正相关(0.58)。DASH与SF-36身体成分总结的相关性高于与精神成分总结的相关性。

结论

挪威语版DASH是肩峰撞击综合征患者可靠且有效的结局指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/560c/3975243/92d1b252103f/1471-2474-15-78-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验