Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Circulation. 2010 Jun 15;121(23):2584-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.892414. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
Antiplatelet drugs are effective in preventing recurrence of atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetic patients. However, the efficacy and usefulness of 2 different antiplatelet drugs, aspirin and cilostazol, in the progression of carotid intima-media thickening are unknown.
To compare prevention by cilostazol and aspirin of progression of atherosclerosis, we conducted a prospective, randomized, open, blinded end point study in 4 East Asian countries. A total of 329 type 2 diabetic patients suspected of peripheral artery disease were allocated to either an aspirin-treated (81 to 100 mg/d) group or a cilostazol-treated (100 to 200 mg/d) group. The changes in intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery during a 2-year observation period were examined as the primary end point. The regression in maximum left, maximum right, mean left, and mean right common carotid artery intima-media thickness was significantly greater with cilostazol compared with aspirin (-0.088 + or - 0.260 versus 0.059 + or - 0.275 mm, P<0.001; -0.042 + or - 0.274 versus 0.045 + or - 0.216 mm, P=0.003; -0.043 + or - 0.182 versus 0.028 + or - 0.202 mm, P=0.004; and -0.024 + or - 0.182 versus 0.048 + or - 0.169 mm, P<0.001). In a regression analysis adjusted for possible confounding factors such as lipid levels and hemoglobin A(1c), the improvements in common carotid artery intima-media thickness with cilostazol treatment over aspirin treatment remained significant.
Compared with aspirin, cilostazol potently inhibited progression of carotid intima-media thickness, an established surrogate marker of cardiovascular events, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: C000000215.
抗血小板药物在预防 2 型糖尿病患者的动脉粥样硬化复发方面是有效的。然而,两种不同的抗血小板药物阿司匹林和西洛他唑在颈动脉内膜中层厚度进展方面的疗效和实用性尚不清楚。
为了比较西洛他唑和阿司匹林对动脉粥样硬化进展的预防作用,我们在东亚的 4 个国家进行了一项前瞻性、随机、开放、盲终点研究。共纳入 329 例疑似外周动脉疾病的 2 型糖尿病患者,随机分配至阿司匹林治疗(81-100mg/d)组或西洛他唑治疗(100-200mg/d)组。主要终点为 2 年观察期内颈总动脉内膜中层厚度的变化。与阿司匹林相比,西洛他唑治疗后最大左、最大右、平均左、平均右颈总动脉内膜中层厚度的回归值明显更大(-0.088±0.260 对 0.059±0.275mm,P<0.001;-0.042±0.274 对 0.045±0.216mm,P=0.003;-0.043±0.182 对 0.028±0.202mm,P=0.004;-0.024±0.182 对 0.048±0.169mm,P<0.001)。在调整血脂水平和糖化血红蛋白 A1c 等可能的混杂因素后进行回归分析,西洛他唑治疗对颈总动脉内膜中层厚度的改善仍明显优于阿司匹林治疗。
与阿司匹林相比,西洛他唑能更有效地抑制 2 型糖尿病患者颈动脉内膜中层厚度的进展,这是心血管事件的一个既定替代标志物。临床试验注册- URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。独特标识符:C000000215。