Suppr超能文献

氟化物化合物和亚锡氯化物作为牙本质侵蚀抑制剂的功效。

Efficacy of fluoride compounds and stannous chloride as erosion inhibitors in dentine.

机构信息

Department of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, Dental Clinic of the Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Caries Res. 2010;44(3):248-52. doi: 10.1159/000314671. Epub 2010 May 27.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-erosive effects of different fluoride compounds and one tin compound in the context of the complex pathohistology of dentine erosion, with particular emphasis on the role of the organic portion. Samples were subjected to two experiments including erosive acid attacks (0.05 molar citric acid, pH 2.3; 6 x 2 min/day) and applications (6 x 2 min/day) of the following test solutions: SnCl(2) (815 ppm Sn), NaF (250 ppm F), SnF(2) (250 ppm F, 809 ppm Sn), amine fluoride (AmF, 250 ppm F), AmF/NaF (250 ppm F), and AmF/SnF(2) (250 ppm F, 409 ppm Sn). The demineralised organic fraction was enzymatically removed either at the end of the experiment (experiment 1) or continuously throughout the experiment (experiment 2). Tissue loss was determined profilometrically after 10 experimental days. In experiment 1, the highest erosive tissue loss was found in the control group (erosion only); the AmF- and NaF-containing solutions reduced tissue loss by about 60%, reductions for SnCl(2), AmF/SnF(2), and SnF(2) were 52, 74 and 89%, respectively. In experiment 2, loss values generally were significantly higher, and the differences between the test solutions were much more distinct. Reduction of tissue loss was between 12 and 34% for the AmF- and NaF-containing preparations, and 11, 67 and 78% for SnCl(2), AmF/SnF(2), and SnF(2), respectively. Stannous fluoride-containing solutions revealed promising anti-erosive effects in dentine. The strikingly different outcomes in the two experiments suggest reconsidering current methodologies for investigating anti-erosive strategies in dentine.

摘要

本研究旨在评估不同氟化物化合物和一种锡化合物在牙本质侵蚀的复杂病理生理学背景下的抗侵蚀作用,特别强调有机部分的作用。样本进行了两项实验,包括侵蚀性酸攻击(0.05 摩尔柠檬酸,pH2.3;每天 6 次,每次 2 分钟)和以下测试溶液的应用(每天 6 次,每次 2 分钟):SnCl2(815ppmSn)、NaF(250ppmF)、SnF2(250ppmF、809ppmSn)、胺氟化物(AmF,250ppmF)、AmF/NaF(250ppmF)和 AmF/SnF2(250ppmF、409ppmSn)。在实验结束时(实验 1)或在整个实验过程中(实验 2)用酶去除脱矿有机部分。在 10 个实验日后用轮廓测定法确定组织损失。在实验 1 中,在对照组(仅侵蚀)中发现了最高的侵蚀性组织损失;含有 AmF 和 NaF 的溶液使组织损失减少了约 60%,SnCl2、AmF/SnF2 和 SnF2 的减少分别为 52%、74%和 89%。在实验 2 中,损失值通常明显更高,并且测试溶液之间的差异更加明显。含有 AmF 和 NaF 的制剂的组织损失减少了 12%至 34%,而 SnCl2、AmF/SnF2 和 SnF2 的减少分别为 11%、67%和 78%。含氟化亚锡的溶液在牙本质中显示出有希望的抗侵蚀作用。这两项实验的截然不同结果表明,需要重新考虑当前研究牙本质抗侵蚀策略的方法学。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验