National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010 Aug;7(8):477-82. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2010.486285.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of two leather (L1, L2) and two rubber (R1, R2) boots on firefighters' metabolic and respiratory variables during simulated firefighting tasks. Twenty-five men and 25 women, while wearing full turnout clothing, a 10.5-kg backpack, gloves, helmet, and one of four randomly assigned pairs of firefighter boots, walked for 6 min at 3 mph (4.8 km/hr) on a level treadmill while carrying a 9.5-kg hose and climbed a stair ergometer for 6 min at 45 steps per min without the hose. Minute ventilation (VE), absolute and relative oxygen consumption (VO2 and VO2 ml kg min(-1), respectively), CO(2) production (VCO2), heart rate (HR), and peak inspiratory (PIF) and expiratory (PEF) flow rates were measured, and an average of the breath-by-breath data from minute 6 was used for analysis. During treadmill exercise, a 1-kg increase in boot weight caused significant (p < 0.05) increases in VE (9%), VO2 (5 - 6%), VCO2 (8%), and HR (6%) for men, whereas a 1-kg increase caused significant increases in VO2 (3 - 4.5%) and VCO2 (4%) for women. During stair ergometry, a 1-kg increase in boot weight caused significant increases in VE(approximately 3%), relative VO2 (approximately 2%), VCO2 (3%), and PIF (approximately 4%) in men and women (p < 0.05) and a significant increase in absolute VO2 (approximately 3.5%) in men only. Mean increases in metabolic and respiratory variables per 1-kg increase in boot weight were in the 5 to 12% range observed previously for men during treadmill walking but were considerably smaller for women. Mean increases in oxygen consumption during stair ergometry were statistically significant but were smaller in the current study than previously observed and may not be practically significant. There was no significant effect of boot design in addition to boot weight for either mode of exercise.
本研究的目的是确定两种皮靴(L1、L2)和两种橡胶靴(R1、R2)对穿着全套消防服、背负 10.5 千克背包、戴手套、戴头盔并穿着 4 双随机分配的消防靴之一的 25 名男性和 25 名女性在模拟消防任务中代谢和呼吸变量的影响。研究人员让这些参与者在水平跑步机上以 3 英里/小时(4.8 公里/小时)的速度行走 6 分钟,同时携带 9.5 千克的水带,并以 45 步/分钟的速度攀登 6 分钟的楼梯式测功计,不携带水带。每分钟通气量(VE)、绝对和相对耗氧量(VO2 和 VO2 ml kg min(-1),分别)、二氧化碳产生量(VCO2)、心率(HR)和吸气峰流速(PIF)和呼气峰流速(PEF)进行了测量,并对第 6 分钟的逐口气数据进行了平均分析。在跑步机运动中,靴重增加 1 公斤会导致男性的 VE(9%)、VO2(5-6%)、VCO2(8%)和 HR(6%)显著增加(p<0.05),而女性 VO2(3-4.5%)和 VCO2(4%)的增加则显著增加。在楼梯式测功计运动中,靴重增加 1 公斤会导致男性和女性的 VE(约 3%)、相对 VO2(约 2%)、VCO2(约 3%)和 PIF(约 4%)显著增加(p<0.05),且男性的绝对 VO2(约 3.5%)也显著增加。与男性在跑步机行走时观察到的 5-12%范围内的每公斤靴重代谢和呼吸变量的平均增加相比,女性的增加幅度要小得多。在楼梯式测功计运动中,耗氧量的平均增加虽然具有统计学意义,但在本研究中比以前观察到的要小,可能在实际中没有意义。对于两种运动模式,靴重以外的靴设计没有明显影响。