Ben-Ezra V, Verstraete R
Department of Physical Education, Texas Woman's University, Denton 76204.
J Occup Med. 1988 Feb;30(2):103-5.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the maximal cardiorespiratory responses of firefighters to stair-climbing work and to compare these responses to maximal treadmill exercise. Thirty-eight firefighters volunteered to participate in the study. Maximal CR including oxygen consumption (VO2), ventilatory equivalent for oxygen (VE/VO2), minute ventilation (VE) and heart rate (HR) were measured during both stair climbing and graded treadmill exercise. The results showed that VO2max and HRmax were significantly lower, 7% and 2% respectively, and the VE/VO2 was significantly higher (6.7%) during the stair-climbing exercise. Maximal VE was not different between the two modes of exercise. The results suggest that since VO2max and HRmax were lower during stair climbing, the metabolic cost of firefighting tasks as related to VO2max on a treadmill may not be accurately reflected. Since stair climbing is a task-specific activity for firefighters, it is recommended that testing of firefighters be performed on a stair-climbing device, and that the difference in VO2max between treadmill and stair-climbing exercise be considered when recommending a desired fitness level for firefighters.
本研究的目的是确定消防员爬楼梯作业时的最大心肺反应,并将这些反应与最大跑步机运动反应进行比较。38名消防员自愿参与该研究。在爬楼梯和分级跑步机运动过程中,测量了包括耗氧量(VO2)、氧通气当量(VE/VO2)、分钟通气量(VE)和心率(HR)在内的最大心肺反应。结果显示,在爬楼梯运动期间,最大摄氧量(VO2max)和最大心率(HRmax)显著降低,分别降低了7%和2%,而氧通气当量(VE/VO2)显著升高(6.7%)。两种运动模式下的最大分钟通气量(VE)没有差异。结果表明,由于爬楼梯时VO2max和HRmax较低,与跑步机上VO2max相关的消防任务的代谢成本可能无法准确反映。由于爬楼梯是消防员的特定任务活动,建议在爬楼梯设备上对消防员进行测试,并且在为消防员推荐理想的体能水平时,应考虑跑步机运动和爬楼梯运动之间VO2max的差异。