Department of Emergency Medicine St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC.
CJEM. 2010 May;12(3):192-200. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012239.
Our primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of 3 immobilization methods (circumferential casting [CC], volar-dorsal splinting [VDS] and modified sugar-tong [MST] splinting) in maintaining the position of displaced distal radius fractures after successful closed reduction. Our secondary objective was to assess longterm functional outcomes associated with immobilization with fibreglass splinting versus standard CC in patients maintaining initial nonoperative reductions.
We conducted a prospective randomized single-blind controlled trial in patients over 18 years of age who presented to the emergency department with a displaced fracture of the distal radius requiring closed reduction. The primary outcome was loss of reduction (defined as radiologic slippage or the need for surgical fixation during the 3-4 week primary immobilization period after initial successful reduction). Secondary outcomes included DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) score, return to work, activities of daily living, wrist pain, range of motion and grip strength assessed at 8 weeks and 6 months.
Thirty participants were randomly assigned to receive MST splinting, 31 to receive VDS and 40 to receive CC. Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. Radiographic loss of reduction occurred in 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1%-28.9%) of participants in the VDS group, 20% (95% CI 7.6%-32.4%) in the CC group and 30% (95% CI 13.6%-46.4%) in the MST splinting group (p = 0.17). Based on multivariate analysis of variance, functional outcomes at 8 weeks were similar among groups (p = 0.89). DASH scores at 8 weeks and 6 months were similar among groups, based on 1-way analysis of variance (p > 0.25).
Rates of loss in anatomic position were not statistically significant among the 3 types of dressings used. However, there was a clinically important trend of increased loss of reduction with the use of MST splinting. Functional outcomes at 8 weeks and 6 months were not significantly different between CC, VDS and MDS splinting. Ease of application and familiarity with use should guide clinical decisions when choosing a dressing type for displaced Colles fractures.
我们的主要目的是确定 3 种固定方法(环形石膏固定[CC]、掌背夹板[VDS]和改良糖钳夹板[MST])在维持闭合复位成功后的桡骨远端移位骨折位置方面的有效性。我们的次要目标是评估在维持初始非手术复位的患者中,使用玻璃纤维夹板固定与标准 CC 固定的长期功能结果。
我们对因需要闭合复位的桡骨远端移位骨折而到急诊科就诊的 18 岁以上患者进行了前瞻性随机单盲对照试验。主要结果是复位丢失(定义为初始成功复位后 3-4 周的原发性固定期间影像学上的滑移或需要手术固定)。次要结果包括 DASH(上肢、肩和手残疾)评分、恢复工作、日常生活活动、腕痛、8 周和 6 个月时的活动范围和握力。
30 名参与者被随机分配接受 MST 夹板固定,31 名接受 VDS,40 名接受 CC。组间基线特征相似。VDS 组有 16%(95%置信区间 [CI] 3.1%-28.9%)、CC 组有 20%(95% CI 7.6%-32.4%)和 MST 夹板组有 30%(95% CI 13.6%-46.4%)的患者发生影像学复位丢失(p=0.17)。基于方差分析的多变量分析,各组 8 周时的功能结果相似(p=0.89)。基于单因素方差分析,8 周和 6 个月时的 DASH 评分在各组间相似(p>0.25)。
在使用的 3 种类型的敷料中,解剖位置丢失的发生率没有统计学意义。然而,使用 MST 夹板固定有增加复位丢失的临床重要趋势。8 周和 6 个月时的功能结果在 CC、VDS 和 MDS 夹板固定之间没有显著差异。在选择桡骨远端 Colles 骨折的敷料类型时,应根据应用的便利性和使用的熟悉程度来指导临床决策。