Centre for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn TR10 EZ, UK.
Science. 2010 Jun 4;328(5983):1269-72. doi: 10.1126/science.1188102.
The understanding of natural and sexual selection requires both field and laboratory studies to exploit the advantages and avoid the disadvantages of each approach. However, studies have tended to be polarized among the types of organisms studied, with vertebrates studied in the field and invertebrates in the lab. We used video monitoring combined with DNA profiling of all of the members of a wild population of field crickets across two generations to capture the factors predicting the reproductive success of males and females. The factors that predict a male's success in gaining mates differ from those that predict how many offspring he has. We confirm the fundamental prediction that males vary more in their reproductive success than females, and we find that females as well as males leave more offspring when they mate with more partners.
自然选择和性选择的理解需要结合野外和实验室研究,以利用每种方法的优势并避免其劣势。然而,研究往往在研究的生物类型之间存在两极分化,脊椎动物在野外研究,无脊椎动物在实验室研究。我们使用视频监测并结合两代野外蟋蟀种群的所有成员的 DNA 分析,来捕捉预测雌雄个体繁殖成功的因素。预测雄性获得配偶成功的因素与预测其拥有多少后代的因素不同。我们证实了一个基本预测,即雄性在繁殖成功方面的差异大于雌性,并且我们发现雌性和雄性与更多的配偶交配时会留下更多的后代。