Suppr超能文献

在局部麻醉下进行眼科整形手术时,使用地西泮或咪达唑仑联合或不联合可乐定进行口服药物治疗。

Oral medication with diazepam or midazolam associated or not with clonidine for oculoplastic office surgery under local anesthesia.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jul-Aug;26(4):269-72. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181c06546.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the level of sedation of oral administration of diazepam or midazolam associated or not with clonidine and their effects on upper eyelid margin position, heart rate, arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation.

METHODS

Seventy consecutive healthy patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II scheduled for lower eyelid blepharoplasty were randomized into 4 groups according to the oral sedative agent used (group 1, diazepam 10 mg; group 2, diazepam 10 mg plus clonidine 0.15 mg; group 3, midazolam 15 mg; group 4, midazolam plus clonidine 0.15 mg). For all patients, the midpupil-to-upper eyelid margin distance, the heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were recorded before and 1 hour after the administration of oral medication. The level of sedation at the time of surgery was measured with the Michigan University scale.

RESULTS

The depth of sedation was significantly more pronounced with midazolam (median score = 2) than with diazepam (median score = 1). Clonidine slightly increased the level of sedation of both diazepam and midazolam. The diastolic arterial blood pressure drop with midazolam associated or not with clonidine was significantly greater than with diazepam. The mean upper eyelid margin position shift (-1.42 mm) verified when clonidine was associated with midazolam was also significantly greater than with diazepam.

DISCUSSION

Oral sedation with diazepam or midazolam associated or not with clonidine is safe for ASA grade I-II patients. The systemic effects of diazepam and midazolam were small and very similar. The sedation induced by midazolam was clearly greater than that induced by diazepam. However, this higher level of sedation was accompanied by a more important shift in upper eyelid margin position.

摘要

目的

比较口服地西泮或咪达唑仑联合或不联合可乐定的镇静水平及其对上睑缘位置、心率、动脉压和血氧饱和度的影响。

方法

70 例连续的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级 I-II 级的健康患者,拟行下眼睑成形术,根据口服镇静剂的不同随机分为 4 组(组 1:地西泮 10mg;组 2:地西泮 10mg 加可乐定 0.15mg;组 3:咪达唑仑 15mg;组 4:咪达唑仑加可乐定 0.15mg)。所有患者在口服药物前和 1 小时记录瞳孔至上睑缘的距离、心率、收缩压和舒张压以及血氧饱和度。手术时采用密歇根大学镇静评分法评估镇静深度。

结果

咪达唑仑(中位数评分=2)的镇静程度明显高于地西泮(中位数评分=1)。可乐定轻度增加了地西泮和咪达唑仑的镇静水平。咪达唑仑联合或不联合可乐定引起的舒张压下降明显大于地西泮。咪达唑仑联合可乐定时平均上睑缘位置的变化(-1.42mm)也明显大于地西泮。

讨论

ASA 分级 I-II 级患者口服地西泮或咪达唑仑联合或不联合可乐定是安全的。地西泮和咪达唑仑的全身作用较小且非常相似。咪达唑仑诱导的镇静作用明显大于地西泮。然而,这种更高的镇静水平伴随着上睑缘位置的更大变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验