• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服咪达唑仑、静脉注射咪达唑仑及口服地西泮的镇静作用。

Sedative effects of oral midazolam, intravenous midazolam and oral diazepam.

作者信息

Tyagi Parimala, Dixit U, Tyagi Sanjeev, Jain Ankur

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, People's Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012 Summer;36(4):383-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.36.4.t1j3625831144371.

DOI:10.17796/jcpd.36.4.t1j3625831144371
PMID:23019837
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the behavioral changes and effect of sedative techniques in pediatric dental patients using Oral Midazolam, Intravenous Midazolam and Oral Diazepam as sedative agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Triple blind randomized control trial with 40 patients aged between 2-10 years, exhibiting definitely negative behavior was considered Patients were randomly assigned to one of the four treatment groups. Group I received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg orally, Group II received 0.5 mg/kg diazepam orally, Group III received 0.06 mg/kg midazolam intravenously and Group IV received oral placebo. Behavioral changes (sleep, crying, movement, and overall behavior) and effect of sedative techniques on pediatric patients were assessed.

RESULTS

All the patients in group 3 were significantly better in post administrative behavior viz. sleep, crying and movement. Over all behavior scores for group 3 patients were significantly better than other three groups (p < 0.001). Positive behavior of patients in group 2 and 3 did not show significant difference but positive behavior in group 3 was significantly (p < 0.05) more than group 2. Placebo group showed the highest negative behavior.

CONCLUSION

Sedative effects of oral midazolam and oral diazepam were comparable, where as intravenous midazolam produced more sedation. Anxiolysis was found to be more in both the midazolam groups than the diazepam group. Most number of positive changes were observed in midazolam groups as compared to diazepam group.

摘要

目的

评估并比较使用口服咪达唑仑、静脉注射咪达唑仑和口服地西泮作为镇静剂时,儿科牙科患者的行为变化及镇静技术的效果。

材料与方法

对40名年龄在2至10岁、表现出明显负面行为的患者进行三盲随机对照试验。患者被随机分配到四个治疗组之一。第一组口服0.5毫克/千克咪达唑仑,第二组口服0.5毫克/千克地西泮,第三组静脉注射0.06毫克/千克咪达唑仑,第四组口服安慰剂。评估行为变化(睡眠、哭闹、活动及总体行为)以及镇静技术对儿科患者的效果。

结果

第三组所有患者在给药后的行为,即睡眠、哭闹和活动方面均明显更好。第三组患者的总体行为评分明显优于其他三组(p < 0.001)。第二组和第三组患者的积极行为无显著差异,但第三组的积极行为明显多于第二组(p < 0.05)。安慰剂组表现出最高的负面行为。

结论

口服咪达唑仑和口服地西泮的镇静效果相当,而静脉注射咪达唑仑产生的镇静作用更强。发现咪达唑仑组的抗焦虑作用均比地西泮组更强。与地西泮组相比,咪达唑仑组观察到的积极变化最多。

相似文献

1
Sedative effects of oral midazolam, intravenous midazolam and oral diazepam.口服咪达唑仑、静脉注射咪达唑仑及口服地西泮的镇静作用。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012 Summer;36(4):383-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.36.4.t1j3625831144371.
2
Sedative effects of oral midazolam, intravenous midazolam and oral diazepam in the dental treatment of children.口服咪达唑仑、静脉注射咪达唑仑及口服地西泮在儿童牙科治疗中的镇静效果。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Spring;37(3):301-5. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.37.3.6u482603r0388558.
3
Comparison of the effectiveness of oral diazepam and midazolam for the sedation of autistic patients during dental treatment.口服地西泮和咪达唑仑在牙科治疗期间对自闭症患者镇静效果的比较。
Pediatr Dent. 2005 May-Jun;27(3):198-206.
4
Sedative effect of oral diazepam and chloral hydrate in the dental treatment of children.口服地西泮和水合氯醛在儿童牙科治疗中的镇静作用。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007 Apr-Jun;25(2):69-75. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.33451.
5
Effect of submucosal midazolam on behavior and physiologic response when combined with oral chloral hydrate and nitrous oxide sedation.黏膜下注射咪达唑仑与口服水合氯醛及氧化亚氮镇静联合使用时对行为和生理反应的影响。
Pediatr Dent. 2004 Jan-Feb;26(1):37-43.
6
Comparative evaluation of Midazolam and Propofol as intravenous sedative agents in the management of unco-operative children.咪达唑仑和丙泊酚作为静脉镇静剂用于处理不合作儿童的比较评估
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2002 Mar;20(1):6-8.
7
Assessment of buccal aerosolized midazolam for pediatric conscious sedation.用于小儿清醒镇静的口腔雾化咪达唑仑评估。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2015 Feb;6(1):40-4. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12062. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
8
Comparing the safety, efficacy and recovery of intranasal midazolam vs. oral chloral hydrate and promethazine.比较鼻内咪达唑仑与口服水合氯醛及异丙嗪的安全性、有效性和恢复情况。
Pediatr Dent. 2001 Sep-Oct;23(5):424-30.
9
A comparative evaluation of intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamine for their sedative and analgesic properties: a triple blind randomized study.鼻内给予右美托咪定、咪达唑仑和氯胺酮镇静镇痛特性的比较评估:一项三盲随机研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Spring;38(3):255-61. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.l828585807482966.
10
Comparison of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry.口服氯胺酮与口服咪达唑仑作为儿科牙科镇静剂的比较。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008 Sep;26(3):97-101.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between gestational age and childhood sleep: a national retrospective cohort study.胎龄与儿童睡眠的关系:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2022 Aug 8;20(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02443-9.
2
Trends for in-office usage of pharmacological sedation agents in India: A narrative review.印度药物镇静剂在门诊使用的趋势:一项叙述性综述。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jan-Mar;38(1):18-27. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_146_20. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
3
Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment.牙科治疗中儿童的镇静
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 17;12(12):CD003877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003877.pub5.
4
Effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in adult patients undergoing dental procedures: protocol for a systematic review.口腔镇静用于牙科手术成年患者的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 13;8(1):e017681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017681.
5
Current methods of sedation in dental patients - a systematic review of the literature.牙科患者当前的镇静方法——文献系统综述
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Sep 1;21(5):e579-86. doi: 10.4317/medoral.20981.
6
Management of a high risk epileptic patient under conscious sedation: A multidisciplinary approach.在清醒镇静下对高危癫痫患者的管理:多学科方法。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016 Jan-Feb;20(1):91-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.170817.
7
Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial.口服咪达唑仑-氯胺酮与单独使用咪达唑仑用于接受计算机断层扫描儿童的程序性镇静:一项随机临床试验。
Emerg (Tehran). 2015 Spring;3(2):64-9.
8
Pain care for patients with epidermolysis bullosa: best care practice guidelines.大疱性表皮松解症患者的疼痛护理:最佳护理实践指南。
BMC Med. 2014 Oct 9;12:178. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0178-2.