[Open surgery and endovascular treatment on the descending thoracic aorta: 15 years' experience].

OBJECTIVE

Outcomes of surgical treatment of the descending thoracic aorta have improved markedly, although high associated morbidity and mortality continue to be a concern. Endovascular treatments are therefore attractive alternatives to open surgery. We compared outcomes of endovascular treatment to outcomes of open surgery on both aortic segments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of patients treated for descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta disease by means of open surgery or endovascular treatment in our hospital between 1995 and 2009. We analyzed preoperative characteristics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative results in both groups.

RESULTS

We retrieved the cases of 22 patients, 10 who underwent open surgery and 12 who received endovascular treatment. Surgery was indicated to treat aneurysm (40%), aortic dissection (30%), or both (30%) in the open surgery group. In the endovascular treatment group, 66.7% had aneurysm, 33.3% dissection, and 0% both. Trauma was involved in 20% of the open surgeries and 16.7% of the endovascular procedures. Forty percent of the open surgery cases and 16.2% of the endovascular interventions were emergencies. Patient age was the only statistically significant between-group difference in preoperative characteristics. Postoperative complication rates were similar. Significant differences were observed in duration of surgery, lengths of critical care unit and total hospital stays, and intubation time (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of postoperative complications in the group of patients undergoing open surgery on the descending thoracic aorta was similar to incidences reported by other hospitals with moderate caseloads. A trend toward reduced morbidity and mortality in the endovascular treatment group was observed, and this group had significantly shorter times of intubation and lengths of critical care unit and hospital stays.