• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信标:一个为卫生专业人员和公众提供高质量心理健康网站的网络门户。

Beacon: a web portal to high-quality mental health websites for use by health professionals and the public.

机构信息

Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2010 Jun 7;192(S11):S40-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03692.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03692.x
PMID:20528708
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the Beacon web portal, which lists and rates quality health websites, collects user characteristics and publishes user feedback; and to report summary data on Beacon's highest-rated (best evidence-based) sites for mental health.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was undertaken in February 2009 for potentially relevant websites through a review of research papers and a recently published book, an internet search of Open Directory Project medical categories, a review of material on a high-profile mental health portal, and a survey of international researchers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All sites were ranked on a 7-point scale from -1 to 5, with negative scores indicating evidence of no effect and scores of 2 or more indicating evidence of efficacy based on reports in the scientific literature.

RESULTS

By March 2010, 183 sites had been identified, of which 122 focused on physical health or wellbeing, 40 targeted anxiety, and 23 targeted depression. Of the eight generalised anxiety disorder sites identified, four achieved ratings of 2 or above. Two social anxiety disorder sites achieved scores higher than 2. Ten panic disorder sites were identified, with three achieving ratings of 2 or above; and five post-traumatic stress disorder sites were identified, with two achieving ratings of 2 or above. Of the 23 identified depression sites, four achieved a rating of 2 or above.

CONCLUSIONS

There are a number of high-quality mental health websites on the internet, and Beacon provides a portal to enable the wide dissemination of these resources.

摘要

目的

描述 Beacon 网络门户,该门户列出并评估了质量健康网站,收集用户特征并发布用户反馈;并报告有关心理健康的 Beacon 评级最高(最基于证据)的网站的汇总数据。

资料来源

2009 年 2 月,通过对研究论文和最近出版的一本书的审查、对 Open Directory Project 医学类别的互联网搜索、对一个知名心理健康门户的材料的审查以及对国际研究人员的调查,对潜在相关网站进行了系统搜索。

选择标准

所有网站都根据科学文献中的报告,按照 7 分制从-1 到 5 进行评分,负数表示无效果,分数为 2 或更高表示有疗效。

结果

到 2010 年 3 月,已经确定了 183 个网站,其中 122 个专注于身体健康或幸福感,40 个针对焦虑症,23 个针对抑郁症。在确定的 8 个广泛性焦虑症网站中,有 4 个达到了 2 分或以上的评分。两个社交焦虑症网站的评分高于 2。确定了 10 个惊恐障碍网站,其中 3 个达到了 2 分或以上的评分;和 5 个创伤后应激障碍网站,其中 2 个达到了 2 分或以上的评分。在确定的 23 个抑郁症网站中,有 4 个达到了 2 分或以上的评分。

结论

互联网上有许多高质量的心理健康网站,Beacon 提供了一个门户,能够广泛传播这些资源。

相似文献

1
Beacon: a web portal to high-quality mental health websites for use by health professionals and the public.信标:一个为卫生专业人员和公众提供高质量心理健康网站的网络门户。
Med J Aust. 2010 Jun 7;192(S11):S40-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03692.x.
2
Public educational psychology services in Israel on the internet.以色列互联网上的公共教育心理学服务。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019 Mar 18;8(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13584-019-0298-4.
3
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
4
Web-Based Information on the Treatment of Tobacco Dependence for Oral Health Professionals: Analysis of English-Written Websites.面向口腔健康专业人员的基于网络的烟草依赖治疗信息:英文网站分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 20;19(10):e349. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8174.
5
How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy?互联网上关于妊娠恶心和呕吐的信息有多少是基于证据的?
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Aug;35(8):697-703. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30859-8.
6
State of the e-mental health field in Australia: where are we now?澳大利亚电子心理健康领域现状:我们现在处于什么位置?
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;47(2):117-20. doi: 10.1177/0004867412471439. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
7
Quality of web-based information on bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍的网络信息质量。
J Affect Disord. 2008 Oct;110(3):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.01.007. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
8
The Application of Internet-Based Sources for Public Health Surveillance (Infoveillance): Systematic Review.基于互联网的公共卫生监测资源应用(信息监测):系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 13;22(3):e13680. doi: 10.2196/13680.
9
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.成人焦虑症的治疗师辅助互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.
10
Quality of information sources about mental disorders: a comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources.精神障碍相关信息源质量:维基百科与集中控制的网络和印刷资源的比较。
Psychol Med. 2012 Aug;42(8):1753-62. doi: 10.1017/S003329171100287X. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Classifying the features of digital mental health interventions to inform the development of a patient decision aid.对数字心理健康干预措施的特征进行分类,以为患者决策辅助工具的开发提供信息。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Mar 26;4(3):e0000752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000752. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Using Web-Based Content to Connect Young People With Real-life Mental Health Support: Qualitative Interview Study.利用基于网络的内容将年轻人与现实生活中的心理健康支持相联系:定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jan 4;7:e38296. doi: 10.2196/38296.
3
Legal and Ethical Considerations for the Design and Use of Web Portals for Researchers, Clinicians, and Patients: Scoping Literature Review.
法律和伦理考虑因素,用于研究人员、临床医生和患者的 Web 门户的设计和使用:范围文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 11;23(11):e26450. doi: 10.2196/26450.
4
State of the Field of Mental Health Apps.心理健康应用程序领域的现状。
Cogn Behav Pract. 2018 Nov;25(4):531-537. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
5
Indigeneity, diversity, and equity in Internet interventions: Could ISRII contribute to making health care a universal human right?互联网干预中的本土性、多样性与公平性:国际互联网干预与健康不平等研究学会能否助力使医疗保健成为一项普遍的人权?
Internet Interv. 2019 Aug 22;18:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100269. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Stakeholder perspectives on evidence for digital mental health interventions: Implications for accreditation systems.利益相关者对数字心理健康干预证据的看法:对认证系统的影响。
Digit Health. 2019 Sep 19;5:2055207619878069. doi: 10.1177/2055207619878069. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
7
Acceptance of Online Medical Websites: An Empirical Study in China.接受在线医疗网站:中国的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 15;16(6):943. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060943.
8
Digital apothecaries: a vision for making health care interventions accessible worldwide.数字药剂师:让全球都能获得医疗保健干预措施的愿景。
Mhealth. 2018 Jun 4;4:18. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.05.04. eCollection 2018.
9
Evaluation of a recommender app for apps for the treatment of depression and anxiety: an analysis of longitudinal user engagement.评估一款用于治疗抑郁和焦虑的应用程序推荐应用程序:对纵向用户参与度的分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):955-962. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy023.
10
Online tools for individuals with depression and neurologic conditions: A scoping review.针对抑郁症和神经系统疾病患者的在线工具:一项范围综述。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;7(4):344-353. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000365.