• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为一名结肠镜检查医师,您如何衡量绩效?

How do you measure performance as a colonoscopist?

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Directorate, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2011 Aug;13(8):939-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02344.x. Epub 2010 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02344.x
PMID:20528896
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to describe an easy and reproducible method of measuring clinical performance in colonoscopy.

METHOD

Data from all endoscopy procedures performed within the main endoscopy unit at Derriford Hospital between January and December 2007 were analysed. Points were allocated for given procedures. A local health economic analysis revealed that at least 8 points (or four colonoscopies) must be performed to meet list costs. The clinical performance was described as a capability index of crude Caecal Intubation Rate (CIR) vs the mean Points Performed/Endoscopy List (points/list).

RESULTS

Overall, 3884 colonoscopies were performed, with a mean crude CIR of 89.6% and 8.3 points/List. Only 7/23 endoscopists consistently met the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) standard in a cost-effective way. An annual colonoscopy rate of ≥ 150 cases was associated with higher points per list (points/list) (P = 0.003). Endoscopists offering ≥ 15% of cases as training cases had significantly higher crude CIRs and points/list (P = 0.051; P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical performance is a function of quality provided in a cost-effective way. Our capability index is an effective and reproducible way of measuring clinical performance. Training was not associated with reduced volume.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述一种测量结肠镜检查临床绩效的简单且可重复的方法。

方法

分析了 2007 年 1 月至 12 月期间在 Derriford 医院主要内镜科进行的所有内镜检查程序的数据。为给定的程序分配了分数。当地卫生经济学分析显示,至少要进行 8 分(或 4 次结肠镜检查)才能满足清单成本。临床绩效被描述为粗盲肠插管率(CIR)与每内窥镜列表分数(points/list)的能力指数。

结果

总体而言,进行了 3884 次结肠镜检查,粗 CIR 平均为 89.6%,每列表分数为 8.3 分。只有 7/23 名内镜医生以具有成本效益的方式始终符合联合胃肠内镜咨询组(JAG)标准。每年结肠镜检查率≥150 例与每列表分数更高相关(points/list)(P=0.003)。提供≥15%的培训病例的内镜医生的粗 CIR 和 points/list 显著更高(P=0.051;P=0.017)。

结论

临床绩效是提供具有成本效益的质量的函数。我们的能力指数是衡量临床绩效的有效且可重复的方法。培训与降低工作量无关。

相似文献

1
How do you measure performance as a colonoscopist?作为一名结肠镜检查医师,您如何衡量绩效?
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Aug;13(8):939-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02344.x. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
2
Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy.数量和认证影响结肠镜检查的质量标准,但不影响专业水平。
Br J Surg. 2012 Oct;99(10):1436-44. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8866.
3
Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: an interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative.提高息肉切除术后监测指南的依从性:一项采用持续质量改进举措的干预性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jan;63(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.08.048.
4
Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice.持续质量改进计划对结肠镜检查实践的有效性。
Endoscopy. 2007 Apr;39(4):314-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-945196. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
5
Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance.对反馈对结肠镜检查操作影响的前瞻性评估。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jul 15;24(2):313-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02973.x.
6
Variability in cecal intubation rate by calculation method: a call for standardization of key performance indicators in endoscopy.盲肠插管率的计算方法差异:呼吁内镜关键绩效指标的标准化。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 May;89(5):1026-1036.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.12.026. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
7
Achieving high quality colonoscopy: using graphical representation to measure performance and reset standards.实现高质量结肠镜检查:使用图形表示来衡量性能并重置标准。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Dec;14(12):1538-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03057.x.
8
Scope to improve: a multi-centre audit of 16 064 colonoscopies looking at caecal intubation rates, over a 2-year period.改进范围:一项为期两年的对16064例结肠镜检查的多中心审计,观察盲肠插管率。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;3(3):124-129. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2012-100118. Epub 2012 May 1.
9
Quality control of colonoscopy procedures: a prospective validated method for the evaluation of professional practices applicable to all endoscopic units.结肠镜检查程序的质量控制:一种适用于所有内镜科室的、经前瞻性验证的专业操作评估方法。
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009 Feb;33(2):103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gcb.2008.04.038. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
10
Towards continuous improvement of endoscopy standards: validation of a colonoscopy assessment form.为持续提高内窥镜标准而努力:结肠镜检查评估表的验证。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Sep;14(9):1126-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02883.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) on endoscopy services in the UK and beyond.胃肠内镜检查联合咨询小组(JAG)对英国及其他地区内镜检查服务的影响。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;10(2):93-106. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-100969. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
2
Endoscopic biopsy as quality assurance for endoscopic services.内镜活检作为内镜服务的质量保证。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e78557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078557. eCollection 2013.