Centre of Research Excellence in Patient Safety, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2010 Apr;40(4):250-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.02161.x.
The indicator 'death in low-mortality diagnosis-related groups (DRG)' is a patient safety indicator (PSI) that can be derived from routinely collected administrative data sources. It is included in a group of PSI that have been proposed to compare and monitor standards of hospital care in Australia. To summarize the attributes of this indicator as a measure of quality and safety in healthcare and examine issues regarding the development process, definitions and use of the indicator in practice. A structured literature search was conducted using the Ovid Medline database to identify peer-reviewed published literature which used 'death in low-mortality DRG' as a quality/safety indicator. Key quality websites were also searched. The studies were critically appraised using a standardized method. A total of 12 articles was identified which met our search criteria. Most were of low methodological quality because of their retrospective study designs. Only three studies provided evidence that the quality of care gap is higher in 'deaths in low-mortality DRG' than in other cases. Most of the studies reviewed show that there are several limitations of the indicator for assessing patient safety and quality of care. The few studies that have assessed associations with other measures of hospital quality have shown only weak and inconsistent associations. Higher quality, prospective, analytic studies are required before 'death in low-mortality DRG' is used as an indicator of quality and safety in healthcare. Based on current evidence, the most appropriate use is as a screening tool for institutions to quickly and easily identify a manageable number of medical records to investigate in more detail.
“低死亡率诊断相关分组(DRG)死亡”指标是一种可以从常规收集的行政数据来源中得出的患者安全指标(PSI)。它包含在一组 PSI 中,这些 PSI 已被提议用于比较和监测澳大利亚医院护理的标准。总结该指标作为医疗保健质量和安全性的衡量标准的属性,并研究该指标在实践中的发展过程、定义和使用方面的问题。使用 Ovid Medline 数据库进行了结构化文献检索,以确定使用“低死亡率 DRG 死亡”作为质量/安全指标的同行评审发表文献。还搜索了主要的质量网站。使用标准化方法对研究进行了批判性评价。确定了符合我们搜索标准的 12 篇文章。由于它们是回顾性研究设计,因此大多数的方法学质量较低。只有三项研究提供了证据表明,在“低死亡率 DRG 死亡”病例中,护理质量差距高于其他病例。大多数已审查的研究表明,该指标在评估患者安全性和护理质量方面存在几个局限性。评估与其他医院质量衡量标准之间关联的少数研究仅显示出较弱且不一致的关联。在将“低死亡率 DRG 死亡”用作医疗保健质量和安全性的指标之前,需要进行更高质量、前瞻性、分析性研究。根据现有证据,最合适的用途是作为机构的筛选工具,以便快速轻松地识别可管理数量的病历进行更详细的调查。