• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喜欢内容,不喜欢包装:医改期间的舆论矛盾。

Liking the pieces, not the package: contradictions in public opinion during health reform.

机构信息

public opinion and survey research at Kaiser Family Foundation, in Menlo Park, California, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1125-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0434.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0434
PMID:20530341
Abstract

Public opinion played a prominent role during the recent health care reform debate. Critics of reform pointed to poll results as evidence that a majority of Americans opposed sweeping changes. Supporters cited polls showing that people favored many specific aspects of the legislation. A closer examination of past and present polling shows that opinion tracked with historic patterns and was relatively stable, even if the contentious public debate suggested a volatile public mood in 2009 and 2010. Going forward, the public will begin reacting to reform implementation, primarily by judging it in terms of their perceptions of and experiences with what the new law does and does not do for people. These opinions could in turn influence implementation or future legislation.

摘要

公众舆论在最近的医疗改革辩论中发挥了突出作用。改革的批评者指出民意调查结果表明,大多数美国人反对全面改革。支持者援引民意调查结果表明,人们赞成立法的许多具体方面。对过去和现在的民意调查进行更仔细的审查表明,意见与历史模式保持一致,相对稳定,即使有争议的公众辩论表明 2009 年和 2010 年公众情绪不稳定。展望未来,公众将开始对改革的实施做出反应,主要是根据他们对新法的看法和对新法为人们所做和未做的事情的看法来判断。这些意见反过来又可能影响实施或未来的立法。

相似文献

1
Liking the pieces, not the package: contradictions in public opinion during health reform.喜欢内容,不喜欢包装:医改期间的舆论矛盾。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1125-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0434.
2
From Massachusetts to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: aboard the health reform express.从马萨诸塞州到宾夕法尼亚大道 1600 号:登上医疗改革专列。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1106-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0429.
3
Polling analysis: public support for health reform was broader than reported and depended on how proposals were framed.民意调查分析:公众对医改的支持比报道的更为广泛,这取决于提案的措辞。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jul;30(7):1242-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0180.
4
The origins and demise of the public option.公共选择的起源与消亡。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1117-24. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0363.
5
Presidents and health reform: from Franklin D. Roosevelt to Barack Obama.总统与医疗改革:从富兰克林·德拉诺·罗斯福到巴拉克·奥巴马。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1096-100. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0420.
6
Implementing insurance market reforms under the federal health reform law.实施联邦医改法案下的保险市场改革。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1152-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0444.
7
Is there life in health care reform?医疗保健改革中有生机吗?
New York Rev Books. 2011 Mar:49-52.
8
Will reform bankrupt us?改革会使我们破产吗?
Newsweek. 1994 Aug 15;124(7):50-4.
9
Progress and promise.进展与前景。
State Health Care Am. 1994:8-16.
10
Missing voices: polling and health care.缺失的声音:民意调查与医疗保健。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011 Dec;36(6):975-87. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1460551.

引用本文的文献

1
Is health politically irrelevant? Experimental evidence during a global pandemic.健康在政治上是否无关紧要?大流行期间的实验证据。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004222. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
2
Healthcare reform: implications for knowledge translation in primary care.医疗改革:对初级保健知识转化的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 25;13:490. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-490.