Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤后瘫痪肌肉的肌肉疲劳特征。

Muscle fatigue characteristics in paralyzed muscle after spinal cord injury.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2011 Jan;49(1):125-30. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.62. Epub 2010 Jun 8.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

The study design used is cross-sectional.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to examine muscle contractile and excitability characteristics during fatigue of the tibialis anterior in six individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and matched able-bodied (AB) controls.

SETTING

McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

METHODS

Muscle compound action potential (M-wave) characteristics, muscle twitch properties, and summated force were examined during a 2 min fatigue protocol of intermittent bursts at 30 Hz (4 s tetanus, 2 s rest) or maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Evoked twitch responses were followed during a recovery period.

RESULTS

M-wave amplitude was smaller in SCI (2.5 ± 1.6 mV in SCI, 5.7 ± 3.2 mV in AB) at baseline, but there was no change in M-wave amplitude or area during fatigue in either group. There was an increase in M-wave duration toward the end of recovery in the SCI group. Peak torque (PT) was not different between groups at baseline (3.8 ± 1.8 Nm in SCI, 3.7 ± 0.6 Nm in AB); PT potentiated significantly during fatigue in the AB, but not SCI group. There was significantly greater fatigue of both PT (43% decline) and summated force (57% decline) in the SCI group compared with the AB group (13% increase and 22% decline for PT and MVC, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The dorsiflexor muscles in people with SCI are significantly more fatiguable than those in AB controls, but decreases in muscle excitability do not seem to be an important contributor to the increased fatiguability. The mechanisms behind the increased fatigue must lie distal to the muscle membrane.

摘要

研究设计

本研究采用的是横断面研究设计。

目的

本研究旨在检测 6 名慢性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者和相匹配的健康对照者(AB)胫骨前肌在疲劳过程中的肌肉收缩和兴奋性特征。

地点

加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿麦克马斯特大学。

方法

在 30Hz 间歇爆发(4s 强直,2s 休息)或最大自主收缩(MVC)疲劳方案下,检测肌肉复合动作电位(M 波)特征、肌肉抽搐特性和总和力。在恢复期内跟踪诱发的抽搐反应。

结果

SCI 组基线时 M 波幅度较小(SCI 组为 2.5±1.6mV,AB 组为 5.7±3.2mV),但两组在疲劳过程中 M 波幅度或面积均无变化。SCI 组在恢复期结束时 M 波持续时间增加。基线时两组的峰值扭矩(PT)无差异(SCI 组为 3.8±1.8Nm,AB 组为 3.7±0.6Nm);AB 组在疲劳过程中,PT 显著增强,但 SCI 组则不然。与 AB 组相比,SCI 组的 PT(下降 43%)和总和力(下降 57%)的疲劳程度明显更高(PT 和 MVC 分别增加 13%和下降 22%)。

结论

SCI 患者的背屈肌比 AB 对照组更容易疲劳,但肌肉兴奋性的降低似乎不是易疲劳性增加的重要原因。增加的疲劳背后的机制一定位于肌肉膜的远端。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验