Alan Fletcher Research Station, Invasive Plant and Animal Science, Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries, Sherwood, Australia.
Ann Bot. 2010 Aug;106(2):371-80. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq119. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
Success of invasive plant species is thought to be linked with their higher leaf carbon fixation strategy, enabling them to capture and utilize resources better than native species, and thus pre-empt and maintain space. However, these traits are not well-defined for invasive woody vines.
In a glass house setting, experiments were conducted to examine how leaf carbon gain strategies differ between non-indigenous invasive and native woody vines of south-eastern Australia, by investigating their biomass gain, leaf structural, nutrient and physiological traits under changing light and moisture regimes.
Leaf construction cost (CC), calorific value and carbon : nitrogen (C : N) ratio were lower in the invasive group, while ash content, N, maximum photosynthesis, light-use efficiency, photosynthetic energy-use efficiency (PEUE) and specific leaf area (SLA) were higher in this group relative to the native group. Trait plasticity, relative growth rate (RGR), photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency and water-use efficiency did not differ significantly between the groups. However, across light resource, regression analyses indicated that at a common (same) leaf CC and PEUE, a higher biomass RGR resulted for the invasive group; also at a common SLA, a lower CC but higher N resulted for the invasive group. Overall, trait co-ordination (using pair-wise correlation analyses) was better in the invasive group. Ordination using 16 leaf traits indicated that the major axis of invasive-native dichotomy is primarily driven by SLA and CC (including its components and/or derivative of PEUE) and was significantly linked with RGR.
These results demonstrated that while not all measures of leaf resource traits may differ between the two groups, the higher level of trait correlation and higher revenue returned (RGR) per unit of major resource need (CC) and use (PEUE) in the invasive group is in line with their rapid spread where introduced.
人们认为入侵植物物种的成功与其更高的叶片碳固定策略有关,这种策略使它们能够更好地捕获和利用资源,从而抢占并维持空间。然而,这些特征在入侵木本藤本植物中还没有得到很好的定义。
在温室环境中,通过研究非本地入侵和本地东南澳大利亚木本藤本植物在不同光照和水分条件下的生物量增益、叶片结构、养分和生理特性,来研究它们的叶片碳获取策略有何不同。
入侵组的叶片构建成本(CC)、热值和碳氮比(C:N)较低,而灰分、N、最大光合作用、光利用效率、光合能量利用效率(PEUE)和比叶面积(SLA)较高。组间的性状可塑性、相对生长率(RGR)、光合氮利用效率和水分利用效率没有显著差异。然而,在整个光照资源范围内,回归分析表明,在相同的叶片 CC 和 PEUE 下,入侵组的生物量 RGR 更高;同样在相同的 SLA 下,入侵组的 CC 较低但 N 较高。总体而言,入侵组的性状协调性(使用两两相关分析)更好。使用 16 个叶片性状的排序表明,入侵-本地二分法的主轴主要由 SLA 和 CC(包括其组成部分和/或 PEUE 的衍生)驱动,与 RGR 显著相关。
这些结果表明,尽管两组之间并非所有叶片资源性状的测量值都不同,但入侵组更高的性状相关性和每单位主要资源需求(CC)和利用(PEUE)获得的更高回报(RGR)与其在引入地的快速传播是一致的。