Mittlmeier T, Bonnaire F, Grützner P A, Lill H, Matthes G, Prokop A, Seifert J, Voigt C, Walcher F, Wölfl C, Siebert H
Abteilung für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik der Universität Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18055, Rostock, Deutschland.
Unfallchirurg. 2010 Jul;113(7):598-605. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1794-8.
An increasing lack of young fellowship trainees in operative medicine, particularly in orthopaedics and traumatology and the various options to counteract this problem during the phases until the individual decision for residency and the fellowship program is made, were the focus of part I. The present part concentrates on residency and the fellowship phase including the individual perspectives after successful training. With respect to an attractive and highly qualified training in orthopaedics and traumatology, three essential points are to be made: a timely general framework, the establishment of a clinic-specific management of training and a general evaluation of training in the sense of a benchmarking system. A flexible work schedule including structural entities, such as an in-hospital day care facility for children, a structured and reliable curriculum of training according to a model curriculum to be adapted to the corresponding training unit including options of rotation to other facilities of training and the integration of nationwide education and mentoring programs represent further elements of an attractive training program. Thus the quality of training will become a decisive criterion of selection. The fellowship program for specialized traumatology inevitably leads to limitations of the whole spectrum of the field with an increasing specialization. In the future the contents of fellowship training will need a well-considered adaptation to the clinical needs and realities in the light of the emerging national trauma network program. A wide field of activity will open up to specialists in orthopaedics and traumatology with a focus on special traumatology considering the rapid changing field of hospital and outpatient care. Thus a systematic and creative reorganization of the residency and fellowship phases will overcome any problem of attractiveness.
第一部分的重点是,从事手术医学的年轻研究员培训生日益短缺,尤其是在骨科和创伤学领域,以及在做出个人住院医师和研究员培训项目决定之前的各个阶段应对这一问题的各种选择。本部分着重讨论住院医师阶段和研究员阶段,包括成功培训后的个人观点。关于有吸引力且高素质的骨科和创伤学培训,有三个要点:及时制定总体框架、建立针对特定诊所的培训管理以及从基准系统的角度对培训进行总体评估。灵活的工作时间表,包括一些结构化实体,如医院内的儿童日托设施、根据适用于相应培训单位的示范课程制定的结构化且可靠的培训课程,包括轮转至其他培训设施的选项以及全国性教育和指导计划的整合,是有吸引力的培训计划的其他要素。因此,培训质量将成为决定性的选拔标准。随着专业化程度的提高,专门创伤学的研究员培训项目不可避免地会导致该领域整体范围的局限性。未来,鉴于新兴的国家创伤网络计划,研究员培训的内容需要根据临床需求和实际情况进行深思熟虑的调整。考虑到医院和门诊护理领域的快速变化,专注于特殊创伤学的骨科和创伤学专家将有广阔的活动领域。因此,对住院医师阶段和研究员阶段进行系统且有创造性的重组将克服任何吸引力方面的问题。