• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What scientists funded by the tobacco industry believe about the hazards of cigarette smoking.由烟草行业资助的科学家们对吸烟危害的看法。
Am J Public Health. 1991 Jul;81(7):894-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.7.894.
2
Tobacco industry scientific advisors: serving society or selling cigarettes?烟草行业的科学顾问:服务社会还是推销香烟?
Am J Public Health. 1991 Jul;81(7):839-42. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.7.839.
3
"A delicate diplomatic situation": tobacco industry efforts to gain control of the Framingham Study.“微妙的外交局势”:烟草业努力控制弗雷明汉研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):841-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.021.
4
Chasing the dollar: why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding.追逐美元:为何科学家应拒绝烟草行业的资助。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Aug;57(8):546-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.8.546.
5
Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.在一项由烟草行业资助的婴儿猝死综合征评估中,关于二手烟的结论突然改变。
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e356-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1922.
6
Cigarette advertising and media coverage of smoking and health.香烟广告以及媒体对吸烟与健康的报道。
N Engl J Med. 1985 Feb 7;312(6):384-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198502073120627.
7
Tobacco as a cause of lung cancer: some reflections.烟草作为肺癌的一个病因:一些思考。
Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Nov 1;146(9):687-94. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009342.
8
Tobacco research funded by the tobacco industry--an ethical conflict.由烟草行业资助的烟草研究——一种伦理冲突。
Addiction. 1997 Sep;92(9):1071-5.
9
Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking.烟草行业的虚假承诺及其对消费者关于吸烟健康风险的错误认知的影响。
Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):I110-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i110.
10
When researchers accept funding from the tobacco industry, do ethics go up in smoke?当研究人员接受烟草行业的资金资助时,道德规范是否会化为乌有?
N Y State J Med. 1985 Jul;85(7):451-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cravings, Control, and Cessation: A Scoping Review of Perceptions of Nicotine Addiction.渴望、控制与戒烟:尼古丁成瘾认知的范围综述
Curr Addict Rep. 2025;12(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s40429-025-00673-4. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
2
Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry.评估烟草控制研究资助项目的标准及其在包含烟草行业资金支持的模式中的应用。
Tob Control. 2009 Jun;18(3):228-34. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.027623. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
3
Science, industry, and tobacco harm reduction: a case study of tobacco industry scientists' involvement in the National Cancer Institute's Smoking and Health Program, 1964-1980.科学、产业与烟草危害降低:以1964年至1980年烟草行业科学家参与美国国家癌症研究所吸烟与健康项目为例
Public Health Rep. 2005 May-Jun;120(3):338-49. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000320.
4
Development of a model of the tobacco industry's interference with tobacco control programmes.烟草行业干扰烟草控制项目模式的发展
Tob Control. 2003 Jun;12(2):140-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.2.140.
5
Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking.烟草行业的虚假承诺及其对消费者关于吸烟健康风险的错误认知的影响。
Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):I110-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i110.
6
Philip Morris' new scientific initiative: an analysis.菲利普·莫里斯公司的新科学计划:一项分析
Tob Control. 2001 Sep;10(3):247-52. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.3.247.
7
Intimidation of CTR-funded scientists claimed.声称存在对由控烟研究基金资助的科学家的恐吓行为。
Am J Public Health. 1992 Sep;82(9):1292-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.9.1292-a.

本文引用的文献

1
Smoking-attributable mortality and years of potential life lost--United States, 1988.1988年美国吸烟所致死亡率及潜在寿命损失年数
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1991 Feb 1;40(4):62-3, 69-71.

由烟草行业资助的科学家们对吸烟危害的看法。

What scientists funded by the tobacco industry believe about the hazards of cigarette smoking.

作者信息

Cummings K M, Sciandra R, Gingrass A, Davis R

机构信息

Department of Cancer Control and Epidemiology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1991 Jul;81(7):894-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.7.894.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.81.7.894
PMID:2053667
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1405206/
Abstract

Despite overwhelming evidence documenting the hazards of cigarette smoking, the tobacco industry denies that smoking has been proven to cause disease. The industry professes a desire to clear up the smoking and health "question" and often points to its support of the Council for Tobacco Research (CTR) as evidence of its interest in investigating the health dangers of smoking. This paper presents results of a survey of CTR-funded scientists regarding their beliefs about the health dangers posed by smoking cigarettes. The vast majority of scientists funded by the CTR believe that cigarette smoking is an addiction that causes a wide range of serious, often fatal, diseases. This result suggests that the tobacco industry is unwilling to accept even the opinions of scientists it has deemed worthy of funding. Scientists should consider the ethical implications of accepting funds from the CTR and other tobacco industry-supported institutions.

摘要

尽管有大量证据证明吸烟的危害,但烟草行业仍否认吸烟已被证实会导致疾病。该行业声称希望澄清吸烟与健康的“问题”,并经常指出其对烟草研究理事会(CTR)的支持,以此作为其对调查吸烟健康危害感兴趣的证据。本文呈现了一项对由CTR资助的科学家进行的调查结果,内容涉及他们对吸烟所造成的健康危害的看法。绝大多数由CTR资助的科学家认为吸烟是一种成瘾行为,会导致多种严重的、往往致命的疾病。这一结果表明,烟草行业甚至不愿接受它认为值得资助的科学家的观点。科学家们应考虑接受来自CTR和其他烟草行业支持机构资金的伦理影响。