Knowledge Utilization Research Centre and School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Public Health. 2010 Jul;124(7):404-11. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.03.026.
To examine the impact of integration of the Iranian Health Ministry and medical universities, which took place in 1985, on 'linking research to action'.
A qualitative study including 18 in-depth interviews and 10 focus group discussions with different stakeholders ranging from researchers, policy makers and service providers in medical and non-medical groups.
A thematic framework was used to identify various positive and negative aspects of the integration on 'linking research to action' to date.
The positive influences on universities that have been established since integration and/or in the peripheral provinces are more prominent. Distribution of health manpower in various parts of the country has almost unanimously been stated as a positive aftermath. On the other hand, the negative influence most agreed upon was the deviation of larger universities from their main commitment of knowledge production, due to overindulgence in service delivery.
Before making any decisions about changing the current structure of the health-research system, the country's national innovation system should be defined. This is because national research problems are not confined to integration and health research, and cover more general aspects. Therefore, any change in integration and health research should be considered secondary to the latter.
考察 1985 年伊朗卫生部与医科大学整合对“研究与行动挂钩”的影响。
一项定性研究,包括对来自医学和非医学团体的不同利益攸关方(研究人员、政策制定者和服务提供者)的 18 次深入访谈和 10 次焦点小组讨论。
采用主题框架来确定迄今为止整合对“研究与行动挂钩”的各种积极和消极方面。
在整合之后或在周边省份成立的大学的积极影响更为明显。国家卫生人力在各地的分配几乎一致被认为是积极的后果。另一方面,大多数人同意的负面影响是,由于过度热衷于提供服务,较大的大学偏离了其主要的知识生产承诺。
在对卫生研究系统的当前结构做出任何改变之前,应确定国家创新系统。这是因为国家研究问题不仅限于整合和卫生研究,还涉及更广泛的方面。因此,任何对整合和卫生研究的改变都应被视为次要的。