D'Sylva Jonathan, Miller Jordan, Gross Anita, Burnie Stephen J, Goldsmith Charles H, Graham Nadine, Haines Ted, Brønfort Gert, Hoving Jan L
School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 1C7, Canada.
Man Ther. 2010 Oct;15(5):415-33. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
Manual therapy interventions are often used with or without physical medicine modalities to treat neck pain. This review assessed the effect of 1) manipulation and mobilisation, 2) manipulation, mobilisation and soft tissue work, and 3) manual therapy with physical medicine modalities on pain, function, patient satisfaction, quality of life (QoL), and global perceived effect (GPE) in adults with neck pain. A computerised search for randomised trials was performed up to July 2009. Two or more authors independently selected studies, abstracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Pooled relative risk (RR) and standardised mean differences (SMD) were calculated when possible. We included 19 trials, 37% of which had a low risk of bias. Moderate quality evidence (1 trial, 221 participants) suggested mobilisation, manipulation and soft tissue techniques decrease pain and improved satisfaction when compared to short wave diathermy, and that this treatment combination paired with advice and exercise produces greater improvements in GPE and satisfaction than advice and exercise alone for acute neck pain. Low quality evidence suggests a clinically important benefit favouring mobilisation and manipulation in pain relief [1 meta-analysis, 112 participants: SMD -0.34(95% CI: -0.71, 0.03), improved function and GPE (1 trial, 94 participants) for participants with chronic cervicogenic headache when compared to a control at intermediate and long term follow-up; but no difference when used with various physical medicine modalities.
手法治疗干预措施常与物理医学方法联合使用或单独使用,以治疗颈部疼痛。本综述评估了1)整脊推拿和关节松动术、2)整脊推拿、关节松动术和软组织治疗,以及3)手法治疗与物理医学方法联合使用对颈部疼痛成人的疼痛、功能、患者满意度、生活质量(QoL)和整体感知效果(GPE)的影响。截至2009年7月,我们进行了计算机化检索以查找随机试验。由两名或更多作者独立选择研究、提取数据并评估方法学质量。尽可能计算合并相对风险(RR)和标准化均数差(SMD)。我们纳入了19项试验,其中37%的试验偏倚风险较低。中等质量证据(1项试验,221名参与者)表明,与短波透热疗法相比,关节松动术、整脊推拿和软组织技术可减轻疼痛并提高满意度,并且对于急性颈部疼痛,这种治疗组合与建议及锻炼相结合,在GPE和满意度方面比单纯的建议及锻炼有更大改善。低质量证据表明,在缓解疼痛方面,整脊推拿和关节松动术具有临床上重要的益处[1项荟萃分析,112名参与者:SMD -0.34(95%CI:-0.71,0.03),与对照组相比,对于慢性颈源性头痛患者,在中期和长期随访时功能和GPE有所改善(1项试验,94名参与者);但与各种物理医学方法联合使用时无差异。