• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国运用小组决策练习“CHAT”进行关于医疗保险福利的公众审议的经验。

Experience in the United States with public deliberation about health insurance benefits using the small group decision exercise, CHAT.

作者信息

Danis Marion, Ginsburg Marjorie, Goold Susan

机构信息

Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.

出版信息

J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jul-Sep;33(3):205-14. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e56340.

DOI:10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e56340
PMID:20539147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3691997/
Abstract

"Choosing Healthplans All Together" (CHAT) is a small group decision exercise designed to give the public a voice in priority setting in the face of unsustainable health care costs. It has been used for research, policy, and teaching purposes. Departments of insurance in various states in the United States have used CHAT to determine public opinion about what should be included in basic health insurance packages for the uninsured. Some municipalities have used it to assess public priorities for direct service delivery to the uninsured. Setting up the exercise requires substantial preparation, but the public finds it simple to use and understand.

摘要

“共同选择健康计划”(CHAT)是一项小组决策活动,旨在让公众在面对难以为继的医疗保健成本时,能够在确定优先事项方面发表意见。它已被用于研究、政策制定和教学目的。美国各州的保险部门已使用CHAT来确定公众对于未参保者基本医疗保险套餐应涵盖内容的看法。一些市政当局已用它来评估为未参保者提供直接服务的公共优先事项。开展这项活动需要大量准备工作,但公众发现它易于使用和理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5188/3691997/869d36f3bedc/nihms472105f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5188/3691997/78539b51e116/nihms472105f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5188/3691997/869d36f3bedc/nihms472105f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5188/3691997/78539b51e116/nihms472105f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5188/3691997/869d36f3bedc/nihms472105f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Experience in the United States with public deliberation about health insurance benefits using the small group decision exercise, CHAT.美国运用小组决策练习“CHAT”进行关于医疗保险福利的公众审议的经验。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jul-Sep;33(3):205-14. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e56340.
2
Choosing Healthplans All Together: a deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources.共同选择健康计划:一项关于分配有限医疗资源的审议活动。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Aug;30(4):563-601. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-4-563.
3
Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage.瑞士 CHAT 研究:公民讨论瑞士医疗保险覆盖的优先事项。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Aug 1;7(8):746-754. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.15.
4
Solidarity and cost management: Swiss citizens' reasons for priorities regarding health insurance coverage.团结协作与成本管理:瑞士公民对医疗保险覆盖范围的优先考虑因素。
Health Expect. 2018 Oct;21(5):858-869. doi: 10.1111/hex.12680. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
5
Will insured citizens give up benefit coverage to include the uninsured?参保公民会放弃福利覆盖范围来纳入未参保者吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Aug;19(8):868-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.32102.x.
6
Enrollees choose priorities for Medicare.参保人选择医疗保险的优先事项。
Gerontologist. 2004 Feb;44(1):58-67. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.1.58.
7
Enhancing employee capacity to prioritize health insurance benefits.提高员工对健康保险福利进行优先级排序的能力。
Health Expect. 2007 Sep;10(3):236-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00442.x.
8
A decision exercise to engage cancer patients and families in deliberation about Medicare coverage for advanced cancer care.一项让癌症患者及其家属参与关于晚期癌症治疗医疗保险覆盖范围审议的决策活动。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jul 19;14:315. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-315.
9
Moving towards social inclusion: Engaging rural voices in priority setting for health.迈向社会包容:让农村声音参与卫生重点事项设定。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13895. doi: 10.1111/hex.13895. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
10
Insurance benefit preferences of the low-income uninsured.低收入未参保者的保险福利偏好
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Feb;17(2):125-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10609.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Community participation and stakeholder engagement in determining health service coverage: A systematic review and framework synthesis to assess effectiveness.社区参与和利益相关者参与确定卫生服务覆盖范围:系统评价和框架综合评估有效性。
J Glob Health. 2023 May 12;13:04034. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04034.
2
Engaging community members in setting priorities for nutrition interventions in rural northern Ghana.让加纳北部农村地区的社区成员参与确定营养干预措施的优先事项。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;2(9):e0000447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000447. eCollection 2022.
3
CHAT SA: Modification of a Public Engagement Tool for Priority Setting for a South African Rural Context.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing employee capacity to prioritize health insurance benefits.提高员工对健康保险福利进行优先级排序的能力。
Health Expect. 2007 Sep;10(3):236-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00442.x.
2
Health insurance benefit packages prioritized by low-income clients in India: three criteria to estimate effectiveness of choice.印度低收入客户优先选择的医疗保险福利套餐:评估选择有效性的三个标准
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Feb;64(4):884-96. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.10.032. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
3
(De)constructing 'basic' benefits: citizens define the limits of coverage.
南非农村背景下优先事项设定的公众参与工具的修改。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):197-209. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.110.
4
How Would Low-Income Communities Prioritize Medicaid Spending?低收入社区将如何优先考虑医疗补助支出?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Jun 1;45(3):373-418. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8161024.
5
Evaluating community deliberations about health research priorities.评估关于健康研究重点的社区审议。
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):772-784. doi: 10.1111/hex.12931. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
6
The Value of Engaging the Public in CHATing About Healthcare Priorities: A Response to Recent Commentaries.让公众参与讨论医疗保健优先事项的价值:对近期评论的回应。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Apr 1;8(4):250-252. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.113.
7
Members of Minority and Underserved Communities Set Priorities for Health Research.少数族裔和服务不足社区成员为健康研究设定优先事项。
Milbank Q. 2018 Dec;96(4):675-705. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12354.
8
Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage.瑞士 CHAT 研究:公民讨论瑞士医疗保险覆盖的优先事项。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Aug 1;7(8):746-754. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.15.
9
Solidarity and cost management: Swiss citizens' reasons for priorities regarding health insurance coverage.团结协作与成本管理:瑞士公民对医疗保险覆盖范围的优先考虑因素。
Health Expect. 2018 Oct;21(5):858-869. doi: 10.1111/hex.12680. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
10
The State as Community in Community-Based Participatory Research.基于社区的参与性研究中的国家作为社区
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(4):515-522. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0059.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):1648-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.6.1648.
4
The coverage priorities of disabled adult Medi-Cal beneficiaries.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006 Aug;17(3):592-609. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2006.0103.
5
Choosing Healthplans All Together: a deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources.共同选择健康计划:一项关于分配有限医疗资源的审议活动。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Aug;30(4):563-601. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-4-563.
6
Will insured citizens give up benefit coverage to include the uninsured?参保公民会放弃福利覆盖范围来纳入未参保者吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Aug;19(8):868-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.32102.x.
7
Enrollees choose priorities for Medicare.参保人选择医疗保险的优先事项。
Gerontologist. 2004 Feb;44(1):58-67. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.1.58.
8
Insurance benefit preferences of the low-income uninsured.低收入未参保者的保险福利偏好
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Feb;17(2):125-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10609.x.
9
The Oregon Health Plan and the political paradox of rationing: what advocates and critics have claimed and what Oregon did.《俄勒冈健康计划与配给制的政治悖论:倡导者与批评者的主张以及俄勒冈州的做法》
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999 Feb;24(1):161-80. doi: 10.1215/03616878-24-1-161.