• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的参与性研究中的国家作为社区

The State as Community in Community-Based Participatory Research.

作者信息

Goold Susan, Rowe Zachary, Calhoun Karen, Campbell Terrance, Danis Marion, Hammad Adnan, Salman Cengiz, Szymecko Lisa, Coombe Chris

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(4):515-522. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0059.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2016.0059
PMID:28569676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5637090/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) typically defines communities by geography, ethnicity, shared health needs, or some combination.

OBJECTIVES

We describe a CBPR project aiming to engage diverse minority and underserved communities throughout Michigan in deliberations about health research priorities.

METHODS

A steering committee (SC) with 15 members from minority and underserved communities and 4 members from research organizations led the project, with the help of regional advisory groups (RAGs) formed at the SC's request. Evaluation of the SC used questionnaires, focused group discussion, and review of SC meetings to describe engagement, partnership, and communication.

LESSONS LEARNED

An academic-community partnership with a diverse, dispersed, and broadly defined community found value in RAGs, dedicated academic staff, face-to-face meetings, varied communication modalities, capacity building tailored to varying levels of CBPR experience, and ongoing evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

A geographically and culturally diverse partnership presents challenges and opportunities in representativeness, relationship building, capacity building, and communication.

摘要

背景

基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)通常根据地理位置、种族、共同的健康需求或某种组合来界定社区。

目的

我们描述了一个CBPR项目,旨在让密歇根州各地不同的少数族裔和服务不足社区参与关于健康研究优先事项的讨论。

方法

一个由来自少数族裔和服务不足社区的15名成员以及来自研究机构的4名成员组成的指导委员会(SC)在应SC要求成立的区域咨询小组(RAGs)的帮助下领导该项目。对SC的评估使用了问卷调查、焦点小组讨论以及对SC会议的审查,以描述参与度、伙伴关系和沟通情况。

经验教训

与一个多样化、分散且定义宽泛的社区建立的学术 - 社区伙伴关系在区域咨询小组、专职学术人员、面对面会议、多样的沟通方式、针对不同CBPR经验水平的能力建设以及持续评估中发现了价值。

结论

一个地理和文化上多样化的伙伴关系在代表性、关系建立、能力建设和沟通方面既带来挑战也带来机遇。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8178/5637090/257d16dc1b21/nihms909681f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8178/5637090/5a5c8411fcb9/nihms909681f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8178/5637090/257d16dc1b21/nihms909681f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8178/5637090/5a5c8411fcb9/nihms909681f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8178/5637090/257d16dc1b21/nihms909681f2.jpg

相似文献

1
The State as Community in Community-Based Participatory Research.基于社区的参与性研究中的国家作为社区
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(4):515-522. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0059.
2
Capacity building through focus group training in community-based participatory research.通过焦点小组培训开展基于社区的参与性研究进行能力建设。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2011 Dec;24(3):638. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
3
Establishing New Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships using the Community-Based Participatory Research Charrette Model: Lessons from the Cancer Health Accountability for Managing Pain and Symptoms Study.使用基于社区的参与式研究工作坊模式建立新的基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系:癌症疼痛和症状管理健康问责制研究的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(1):89-99. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0010.
4
Participatory evaluation of a community-academic partnership to inform capacity-building and sustainability.社区-学术伙伴关系的参与式评估,以指导能力建设和可持续性发展。
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Oct;52:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
5
Community capacity building and sustainability: outcomes of community-based participatory research.社区能力建设与可持续性:基于社区的参与性研究成果
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):349-60. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0048.
6
Developing a Community-Academic Partnership to Promote Mental Health Among Underserved Preadolescent Girls in Boston, Massachusetts.建立社区-学术伙伴关系以促进马萨诸塞州波士顿地区服务不足的青春期前女孩的心理健康。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(3):321-328. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0056.
7
Partnering with community-based organizations: an academic institution's evolving perspective.与社区组织合作:学术机构不断演变的视角。
Ethn Dis. 2007 Winter;17(1 Suppl 1):S27-32.
8
Voices of Community Partners: Perspectives Gained from Conversations of Community-Based Participatory Research Experiences.社区合作伙伴的声音:从基于社区的参与式研究经验的对话中获得的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 21;17(14):5245. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145245.
9
A Community Health Initiative: Evaluation and Early Lessons Learned.一项社区健康倡议:评估与早期经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016 Spring;10(1):89-101. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0011.
10
Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities.社区为基础的参与式研究:一种旨在消除健康差异的政策倡导能力建设方法。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2094-102. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.170506. Epub 2010 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Inclusion strategies in multi-stakeholder dialogues: The case of a community-based participatory research on immunization in Nigeria.多方利益攸关者对话中的包容性策略:尼日利亚基于社区的参与性免疫研究案例。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 22;17(3):e0264304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264304. eCollection 2022.
2
Drug shortage management: A qualitative assessment of a collaborative approach.药品短缺管理:合作方法的定性评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 23;16(4):e0243870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243870. eCollection 2021.
3
How Would Low-Income Communities Prioritize Medicaid Spending?

本文引用的文献

1
Research ethics and indigenous communities.研究伦理与原住民社区。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec;103(12):2146-52. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301522. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
2
Team-building activities as strategies for improving community-university partnerships: lessons learned from Nuestro Futuro Saludable.团队建设活动作为改善社区与大学伙伴关系的策略:从“我们健康的未来”项目中汲取的经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Summer;6(2):213-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0030.
3
Operationalization of community-based participatory research principles: assessment of the national cancer institute's community network programs.
低收入社区将如何优先考虑医疗补助支出?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Jun 1;45(3):373-418. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8161024.
4
Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review.长期社区参与式研究(CBPR)伙伴关系的成功:范围文献综述。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;47(4):556-568. doi: 10.1177/1090198119882989. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
5
Shifting from "Community-Placed" to "Community-Based" Research to Advance Health Equity: A Case Study of the Heatwaves, Housing, and Health: Increasing Climate Resiliency in Detroit (HHH) Partnership.从“社区安置”到“社区为基础”的研究转变,以促进健康公平:以底特律热浪、住房和健康:提高气候适应能力(HHH)伙伴关系为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 9;16(18):3310. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183310.
6
Evaluating community deliberations about health research priorities.评估关于健康研究重点的社区审议。
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):772-784. doi: 10.1111/hex.12931. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
7
Members of Minority and Underserved Communities Set Priorities for Health Research.少数族裔和服务不足社区成员为健康研究设定优先事项。
Milbank Q. 2018 Dec;96(4):675-705. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12354.
8
A Retrospective on the Vision for : .对……愿景的回顾 : 。 你提供的原文“A Retrospective on the Vision for :.”似乎不太完整,冒号后面缺少具体内容,请补充完整以便能更准确地翻译。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(1):1-11. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0001.
基于社区的参与式研究原则的实施:国家癌症研究所社区网络项目的评估。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jun;102(6):1195-203. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300304. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
4
Collaboration strategies in nontraditional community-based participatory research partnerships: lessons from an academic−community partnership with autistic self-advocates.非传统社区参与式研究伙伴关系中的合作策略:来自与自闭症自我倡导者的学术-社区伙伴关系的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Summer;5(2):143-50. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0022.
5
From the ground up: building a participatory evaluation model.自下而上:构建参与式评估模型。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Spring;5(1):45-52. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0007.
6
Getting started in CBPR: lessons in building community partnerships for new researchers.社区为基础的参与式研究入门:为新研究人员建立社区伙伴关系的经验教训。
Nurs Inq. 2010 Dec;17(4):282-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2010.00510.x.
7
Experience in the United States with public deliberation about health insurance benefits using the small group decision exercise, CHAT.美国运用小组决策练习“CHAT”进行关于医疗保险福利的公众审议的经验。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jul-Sep;33(3):205-14. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e56340.
8
Lessons learned from community-based participatory research in Indian country.从印第安地区基于社区的参与性研究中获得的经验教训。
Cancer Control. 2005 Nov;12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):70-6. doi: 10.1177/1073274805012004s10.
9
Choosing Healthplans All Together: a deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources.共同选择健康计划:一项关于分配有限医疗资源的审议活动。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Aug;30(4):563-601. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-4-563.
10
What is community? An evidence-based definition for participatory public health.什么是社区?一个基于证据的参与性公共卫生定义。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Dec;91(12):1929-38. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.12.1929.