Suppr超能文献

评估缓释安非他酮及强化医生建议在戒烟中的有效性。

Assessment of the effectiveness of sustained release Bupropion and intensive physician advice in smoking cessation.

作者信息

Singh Pranav, Kumar Raj

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, India.

出版信息

Lung India. 2010 Jan;27(1):11-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.59262.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tobacco use is the cause of immense burden on our nation in terms of mortality and morbidity, being the single leading cause of preventable illnesses and death. Smoking cessation interventions in our country will be the most cost effective of all interventions considering that the cost incurred on the three main tobacco related illnesses (COPD, CAD, and Cancer) being around Rs 27,761 crore in the year 1999. MATRIALS AND METHODS: A double blind placebo controlled trial was conducted to see the efficacy of Bupropion in smoking cessation. Smokers with current depression were excluded. The subjects (n = 30) were randomly assigned to receive Bupropion SR 300 mg/day or placebo for seven weeks. Target quit date was preferentially 8(th) day of starting the treatment. Intensive counseling was provided by the physician at the baseline and brief counseling at every visit weekly during the treatment phase and at weeks 12 and 16. Self reported abstinence was confirmed by a carbon monoxide concentration in expired air of less than 10 ppm.

RESULTS

The seven-day point prevalence abstinence rate at the end of week 2 and week 16 in the drug group was 46.67% and 53.33 % respectively and in the placebo group was 13.33% and 20% respectively with the 'P' value of 0.04 and 0.05 respectively. Rates of continuous abstinence at weeks 4, 7 and 16 were 46.67%, 40% and 33.33% in the drug group and 13.33%, 13.33% and 13.33% in the placebo group respectively. The rates were significantly higher in the drug group till week 4 starting from week 2 of the treatment phase. The mean weight gain in drug group was found to be significant less as compared to the placebo at week 16 (P = 0.025) The mean change of depression scores from the baseline was not significantly different between the two groups at any point of time. The withdrawal symptom score increase from the baseline was not significantly higher at any point of time in the drug group but in the placebo group the increase was significantly higher for seven days after target quit date and at weeks 3 and 4 (P < 0.05). The most common adverse events in the drug group were insomnia, which was seen in 6 (40%) patients and dry mouth and/or altered taste in 4 (26.67%) patients, which was significantly higher as compared to placebo. PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME: The univariate predictors of a successful outcome were the point prevalence abstinence at week 16 were older age (>40 years), (P = 0.044) and quitter status at week 2 (P = 0.001). Multivariate predictors in order of importance were Quit status at 2nd week (P = 0.002) and Age >40 years (P = 0.031). The combined predictive value of these two variables was found to be 86.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Bupropion helps in smoking cessation. This has been proved by three large multicenter randomized controlled trials. This study has also reflected the same result in the form of significantly high seven-day point prevalence abstinence at week 16 in the Bupropion group as compared to placebo. Bupropion has a beneficial effect on weight gain and withdrawal symptoms and the benign adverse effects of insomnia and dry mouth or altered taste make it a very effective and cheap treatment for nicotine addiction in smokers.

摘要

背景

烟草使用在死亡率和发病率方面给我国带来了巨大负担,是可预防疾病和死亡的首要单一原因。鉴于1999年与烟草相关的三种主要疾病(慢性阻塞性肺疾病、冠心病和癌症)的花费约为277.61亿卢比,我国的戒烟干预措施将是所有干预措施中最具成本效益的。

材料与方法

进行了一项双盲安慰剂对照试验,以观察安非他酮在戒烟方面的疗效。排除当前患有抑郁症的吸烟者。受试者(n = 30)被随机分配接受安非他酮缓释片300毫克/天或安慰剂,为期七周。目标戒烟日期优先为开始治疗的第8天。在基线时由医生提供强化咨询,并在治疗阶段每周每次就诊时以及在第12周和第16周提供简短咨询。自我报告的戒烟情况通过呼出气体中一氧化碳浓度低于10 ppm来确认。

结果

在第2周和第16周结束时,药物组的七天点患病率戒烟率分别为46.67%和53.33%,安慰剂组分别为13.33%和20%,“P”值分别为0.04和0.05。在第4周、第7周和第16周的持续戒烟率在药物组分别为46.67%、40%和33.33%,在安慰剂组分别为13.33%、13.33%和13.33%。从治疗阶段第2周开始到第4周,药物组的戒烟率显著高于安慰剂组。在第16周时,发现药物组的平均体重增加明显低于安慰剂组(P = 0.025)。在任何时间点,两组之间抑郁评分相对于基线的平均变化均无显著差异。在药物组中,从基线开始的戒断症状评分增加在任何时间点均无显著升高,但在安慰剂组中,在目标戒烟日期后的七天以及第3周和第4周,增加显著更高(P < 0.05)。药物组中最常见的不良事件是失眠,6名(40%)患者出现,4名(26.67%)患者出现口干和/或味觉改变,与安慰剂相比显著更高。

结果预测因素

成功结果的单变量预测因素是第16周的点患病率戒烟,年龄较大(>40岁)(P = 0.044)以及第2周的戒烟状态(P = 0.001)。多变量预测因素按重要性顺序为第2周的戒烟状态(P = 0.002)和年龄>40岁(P = 0.031)。发现这两个变量的联合预测价值为86.3%。

结论

安非他酮有助于戒烟。这已被三项大型多中心随机对照试验所证实。本研究也以安非他酮组在第16周时七天点患病率戒烟率显著高于安慰剂组的形式反映了相同结果。安非他酮对体重增加和戒断症状有有益影响,失眠、口干或味觉改变等良性不良反应使其成为吸烟者尼古丁成瘾的一种非常有效且廉价的治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验