Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan 49401, USA.
Aggress Behav. 2010 Jul-Aug;36(4):251-60. doi: 10.1002/ab.20345.
Data from three studies provide new evidence to support the validity of the Analog Parenting Task (APT) as an instrument to assess risk for harsh, physically aggressive parenting. In this series of studies, there was a strong association between APT scores of expected use and escalation of discipline strategies and self-reported disciplinary attitudes. APT scores were also associated with physical abuse potential as assessed by both a well-established measure of child abuse potential (Child Abuse Potential Inventory) and another instrument designed specifically for use in pre-parent populations (e.g., Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory-2). This study provides new psychometric evidence to support the use of the APT to assess harsh parenting. Additionally, these data highlight the connection between acceptance and use of physical disciplinary strategies, propensity for disciplinary escalation, and risk for abuse perpetration. The findings are discussed in the context of Milner's Social Information Processing model [Milner, 2003] of abuse, which suggests that parental selection of disciplinary responding and the monitoring of disciplinary responding are key events in the disciplinary process. The APT may prove a useful adjunct to more commonly used self-report measures to allow for multimethod assessment of risk for punitive parenting.
三项研究的数据提供了新的证据,支持模拟父母任务(APT)作为评估严厉、身体攻击性行为的父母风险的工具的有效性。在这一系列研究中,预期使用 APT 得分与纪律策略的升级和自我报告的纪律态度之间存在很强的关联。APT 得分还与身体虐待潜力有关,这是通过一种成熟的儿童虐待潜力评估工具(儿童虐待潜力量表)和另一种专门为预备父母群体设计的工具(例如,成人-青少年父母问卷-2)来评估的。这项研究提供了新的心理测量证据,支持使用 APT 来评估严厉的育儿方式。此外,这些数据突出了接受和使用身体纪律策略、纪律升级的倾向以及虐待行为的风险之间的联系。研究结果在米尔纳的虐待社会信息处理模型[Milner, 2003]的背景下进行了讨论,该模型表明,父母选择纪律回应和纪律回应的监测是纪律过程中的关键事件。APT 可能被证明是一种有用的辅助工具,可以与更常用的自我报告措施相结合,以便对惩罚性育儿风险进行多方法评估。