• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合作者联合起来!集合关联特别促进中型协会的合作。

Cooperators Unite! Assortative linking promotes cooperation particularly for medium sized associations.

机构信息

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.

出版信息

BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Jun 11;10:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-173.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2148-10-173
PMID:20540710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2898689/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evolution of cooperative behaviour is widely studied in different models where interaction is heterogeneous, although static among individuals. However, in nature individuals can often recognize each other and chose, besides to cooperate or not, to preferentially associate with or to avoid certain individuals.Here we consider a dynamical interaction graph, in contrast to a static one. We propose several rules of rejecting unwanted partners and seeking out new ones, and study the probability of emergence and maintenance of cooperation on these dynamic networks.

RESULTS

Our simulations reveal that cooperation can evolve and be stable in the population if we introduce preferential linking, even if defectors can perform it too. The fixation of cooperation has higher probability than that of on static graphs, and this effect is more prevalent at high benefit to cost ratios. We also find an optimal number of partners, for which the fixation probability of cooperation shows a maximum.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability to recognize, seek out or avoid interaction partners based on the outcome of past interactions has an important effect on the emergence of cooperation. Observations about the number of partners in natural cooperating groups are in concordance with the result of our model.

摘要

背景

合作行为的进化在不同的模型中得到了广泛的研究,这些模型中的个体间的相互作用是异质的,尽管个体之间的相互作用是静态的。然而,在自然界中,个体通常可以相互识别,并选择与某些个体优先关联或避免某些个体,而不仅仅是合作或不合作。在这里,我们考虑了一个动态的相互作用图,与静态图相反。我们提出了几种拒绝不想要的伙伴并寻找新伙伴的规则,并研究了在这些动态网络中合作的出现和维持的概率。

结果

我们的模拟结果表明,如果我们引入优先链接,即使缺陷者也可以进行优先链接,合作也可以在种群中进化并保持稳定。与静态图相比,合作的固定具有更高的概率,并且这种效应在高收益成本比下更为普遍。我们还发现了一个最佳伙伴数量,在这个数量下,合作的固定概率达到最大值。

结论

基于过去相互作用的结果来识别、寻求或避免相互作用伙伴的能力对合作的出现有重要影响。关于自然合作群体中伙伴数量的观察结果与我们模型的结果一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44aa/2898689/dcc780d23d1e/1471-2148-10-173-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44aa/2898689/cccab66fc2e7/1471-2148-10-173-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44aa/2898689/d6b343454be7/1471-2148-10-173-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44aa/2898689/9ed50d43cfee/1471-2148-10-173-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44aa/2898689/b85bf4159c25/1471-2148-10-173-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44aa/2898689/dcc780d23d1e/1471-2148-10-173-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44aa/2898689/cccab66fc2e7/1471-2148-10-173-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44aa/2898689/d6b343454be7/1471-2148-10-173-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44aa/2898689/9ed50d43cfee/1471-2148-10-173-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44aa/2898689/b85bf4159c25/1471-2148-10-173-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44aa/2898689/dcc780d23d1e/1471-2148-10-173-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Cooperators Unite! Assortative linking promotes cooperation particularly for medium sized associations.合作者联合起来!集合关联特别促进中型协会的合作。
BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Jun 11;10:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-173.
2
Fixation properties of multiple cooperator configurations on regular graphs.正则图上多重合作者构型的固定性质
Theory Biosci. 2019 Nov;138(2):261-275. doi: 10.1007/s12064-019-00293-3. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
Evolution of cooperation in a heterogeneous graph: fixation probabilities under weak selection.异质图中合作的演化:弱选择下的固定概率。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 20;8(6):e66560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066560. Print 2013.
4
Green-beard effect predicts the evolution of traitorousness in the two-tag Prisoner's dilemma.绿须效应预测了双标签囚徒困境中背叛行为的演化。
J Theor Biol. 2011 Nov 7;288:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.07.023. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
5
The evolution of prompt reaction to adverse ties.对不良关系的即时反应的演变。
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Oct 17;8:287. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-287.
6
Properties of network structures, structure coefficients, and benefit-to-cost ratios.网络结构的属性、结构系数和效益成本比。
Biosystems. 2019 Jun;180:88-100. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
7
Spatial invasion of cooperation.合作的空间入侵
J Theor Biol. 2008 Feb 21;250(4):634-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.11.002. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
8
Evolution of cooperation on dynamical graphs.动态图上合作行为的演变
Biosystems. 2009 Apr;96(1):65-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.11.009. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
9
Collective chasing behavior between cooperators and defectors in the spatial prisoner's dilemma.合作与背叛者在空间囚徒困境中的集体追逐行为。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 5;8(7):e67702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067702. Print 2013.
10
A condition for cooperation in a game on complex networks.复杂网络博弈中的合作条件。
J Theor Biol. 2011 Jan 21;269(1):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.033. Epub 2010 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Network topology and movement cost, not updating mechanism, determine the evolution of cooperation in mobile structured populations.网络拓扑结构和迁移成本而非更新机制决定了移动结构种群中合作的演化。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 1;18(8):e0289366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289366. eCollection 2023.
2
Evolution of Cooperation in Social Dilemmas on Complex Networks.复杂网络上社会困境中合作的演变
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Feb 29;12(2):e1004779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004779. eCollection 2016 Feb.
3
Differential adhesion between moving particles as a mechanism for the evolution of social groups.

本文引用的文献

1
A social network analysis of primate groups.灵长类群体的社会网络分析。
Primates. 2009 Oct;50(4):343-56. doi: 10.1007/s10329-009-0153-2. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
2
Social structure of primate interaction networks facilitates the emergence of cooperation.灵长类动物互动网络的社会结构促进了合作的出现。
Biol Lett. 2009 Aug 23;5(4):462-4. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0204. Epub 2009 May 14.
3
Evolution of cooperation on dynamical graphs.动态图上合作行为的演变
移动粒子间的差异黏附作为社会群体进化的一种机制。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Feb 27;10(2):e1003482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003482. eCollection 2014 Feb.
Biosystems. 2009 Apr;96(1):65-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.11.009. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
4
Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks.基于声誉的伙伴选择促进社交网络中的合作。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Aug;78(2 Pt 2):026117. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.026117. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
5
Wolf pack size and food acquisition.狼群规模与食物获取。
Am Nat. 1997 Oct;150(4):513-7. doi: 10.1086/286079.
6
The effect of dispersal and neighbourhood in games of cooperation.合作博弈中扩散与邻域的影响
J Theor Biol. 2008 Jul 21;253(2):221-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.037. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
7
Evolutionary stability on graphs.图上的进化稳定性
J Theor Biol. 2008 Apr 21;251(4):698-707. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.01.005. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
8
Repeated games and direct reciprocity under active linking.主动链接下的重复博弈与直接互惠
J Theor Biol. 2008 Feb 21;250(4):723-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.10.040. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
9
The evolution of helping and harming on graphs: the return of the inclusive fitness effect.图上帮助与伤害行为的演变:广义适合度效应的回归。
J Evol Biol. 2007 Nov;20(6):2284-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01414.x.
10
Evolution of cooperation in a finite homogeneous graph.有限齐次图中合作的演化
Nature. 2007 May 24;447(7143):469-72. doi: 10.1038/nature05784.