Marrinya Pty Ltd, Wuk Wuk, Victoria 3875, Australia.
Meat Sci. 2010 Sep;86(1):227-35. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.05.010. Epub 2010 May 12.
This paper addresses the principles relating to meat standards and grading of beef and advances the concept that potential exists to achieve significant desirable change from adopting more consumer focused systems within accurate value-based payment frameworks. The paper uses the definitions that classification is a set of descriptive terms describing features of the carcass that are useful to those involved in the trading of carcasses, whereas grading is the placing of different values on carcasses for pricing purposes, depending on the market and requirements of traders. A third definition is consumer grading, which refers to grading systems that seek to define or predict consumer satisfaction with a cooked meal. The development of carcass classification and grading schemes evolved from a necessity to describe the carcass using standard terms to facilitate trading. The growth in world trade of meat and meat products and the transition from trading carcasses to marketing individual meal portions raises the need for an international language that can service contemporary needs. This has in part been addressed by the United Nations promoting standard languages on carcasses, cuts, trim levels and cutting lines. Currently no standards exist for describing consumer satisfaction. Recent Meat Standards Australia (MSA) research in Australia, Korea, Ireland, USA, Japan and South Africa showed that consumers across diverse cultures and nationalities have a remarkably similar view of beef eating quality, which could be used to underpin an international language on palatability. Consumer research on the willingness to pay for eating quality shows that consumers will pay higher prices for better eating quality grades and generally this was not affected by demographic or meat preference traits of the consumer. In Australia the MSA eating quality grading system has generated substantial premiums to retailers, wholesalers and to the producer. Future grading schemes which measure both carcass yield and eating quality have the potential to underpin the development and implementation of transparent value-based payment systems which will encourage improved production efficiency throughout the supply chain.
本文探讨了与牛肉标准和分级相关的原则,并提出了一个观点,即通过在基于准确价值的支付框架内采用更以消费者为中心的系统,有可能实现显著的理想变革。本文使用了以下定义:分类是一组描述胴体特征的术语,这些术语对参与胴体交易的人有用;而分级是根据市场和交易者的要求,对胴体进行不同价值的定价;第三个定义是消费者分级,它指的是旨在定义或预测消费者对熟肉满意度的分级系统。胴体分类和分级系统的发展源于使用标准术语描述胴体以促进交易的必要性。肉类和肉类产品的世界贸易增长以及从交易胴体向营销单个餐份的转变,提高了对能够满足当代需求的国际语言的需求。联合国在胴体、切块、修剪水平和切割线方面推广标准语言,在一定程度上解决了这一问题。目前还没有描述消费者满意度的标准。最近澳大利亚肉类标准协会(MSA)在澳大利亚、韩国、爱尔兰、美国、日本和南非进行的研究表明,来自不同文化和国家的消费者对牛肉食用质量有着惊人相似的看法,这可以作为一种国际语言来支撑食用质量的可接受性。消费者对食用质量的支付意愿研究表明,消费者愿意为更好的食用质量等级支付更高的价格,而且通常这不受消费者人口统计学或肉类偏好特征的影响。在澳大利亚,MSA 食用质量分级系统为零售商、批发商和生产者带来了可观的溢价。未来衡量胴体产量和食用质量的分级系统有可能为透明的基于价值的支付系统的开发和实施提供支持,这将鼓励整个供应链提高生产效率。