Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ferrara, Italy.
Gait Posture. 2010 Jun;32(2):282-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.05.011. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
The reliability of kinematic measurements has a top priority in gait analysis. The aim of the present work was to assess the inter-trial, inter-session and inter-examiner variability of an anatomical-based protocol by an established method. The gait of two young adult volunteers was analyzed by four examiners with different degrees of experience in three sessions 1 week apart. The data of five trials of level walking were collected and the rotations in the three anatomical planes of the pelvis, hip, knee and ankle were calculated. The mean value over the gait cycle of the standard deviation of these rotations was calculated for each of the 24 groups of five trials (inter-trial), the eight groups of five trials multiplied by three sessions (inter-session), and the two groups of five trials multiplied by three sessions multiplied by four examiners (inter-examiner). For each rotation, the inter-examiner variability was larger than the inter-session, and the latter larger than the inter-trial. The present ratio between inter-examiner and inter-trial variability was found to be smaller than that of the conventional protocol for each of the gait variables.
在步态分析中,运动学测量的可靠性至关重要。本研究旨在通过一种既定方法评估基于解剖学的方案的试验内、试验间和检查者间变异性。在三个相隔一周的试验中,四名具有不同经验水平的检查者对两名年轻成年志愿者的步态进行了分析。采集了五个水平步行试验的数据,并计算了骨盆、髋关节、膝关节和踝关节三个解剖平面的旋转。计算了每个 24 组五次试验(试验内)、八组五次试验乘以三个试验(试验间)和两组五次试验乘以三个试验乘以四个检查者(检查者间)的这些旋转在步态周期内的标准偏差的平均值。对于每个旋转,检查者间变异性大于试验间,后者大于试验内。对于每个步态变量,发现本研究中检查者间和试验内变异性之间的比率均小于传统方案。