Centre for Research into Disability and Society, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Clin Rehabil. 2010 Aug;24(8):727-44. doi: 10.1177/0269215509360648. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
To evaluate an online fatigue self-management programme in a sample of adults with chronic neurological conditions.
Randomized controlled trial.
Online fatigue self-management programme delivered across Australia.
Ninety-five people with fatigue secondary to multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease or post-polio syndrome.
An online fatigue self-management programme, an information-only fatigue self-management programme and a control group.
Groups were compared at pre test, post test and at three months on primary outcomes using the Fatigue Impact Scale, Activity Card Sort and Personal Wellbeing Index.
With the exception of the Personal Wellbeing Index at post test (F = 3.519; P =0.034) and the Physical Subscale of the Fatigue Impact Scale at follow-up (F = 3.473; P =0.035) there were no significant differences between the three groups on primary outcomes. Post-hoc testing showed the differences to be between the information-only and control groups (P = 0.036 and P = 0.030 respectively). Improvement in the information-only group was unexpected but appears to be similar to results of other online interventions. The fatigue self-management and information-only groups performed better than the control on some secondary outcome measures. Low power in the analysis may have contributed to the findings. Repeated-measures ANCOVA showed that the fatigue self-management and the information-only groups improved over time on the Fatigue Impact Scale and the Activity Card Sort (P<0.05). The control group showed no improvements over time.
Although the fatigue self-management group improved over time, results did not demonstrate additional benefit in most outcome measures when compared with the control group.
评估一项针对慢性神经系统疾病成人的在线疲劳自我管理计划。
随机对照试验。
在澳大利亚各地提供在线疲劳自我管理计划。
95 名因多发性硬化症、帕金森病或脊髓灰质炎后综合征而出现疲劳的成年人。
在线疲劳自我管理计划、仅提供信息的疲劳自我管理计划和对照组。
在预测试、后测试和三个月时,使用疲劳影响量表、活动卡片分类和个人幸福感指数对主要结局进行组间比较。
除后测试的个人幸福感指数(F = 3.519;P = 0.034)和随访时的疲劳影响量表的身体子量表(F = 3.473;P = 0.035)外,三组在主要结局上无显著差异。事后检验显示差异仅存在于信息组和对照组之间(P = 0.036 和 P = 0.030)。信息组的改善出乎意料,但似乎与其他在线干预的结果相似。疲劳自我管理组和信息组在一些次要结局测量上的表现优于对照组。分析中的低功效可能导致了这些发现。重复测量方差分析显示,疲劳自我管理组和信息组在疲劳影响量表和活动卡片分类上随时间改善(P<0.05)。对照组随时间无改善。
尽管疲劳自我管理组随时间改善,但与对照组相比,在大多数结局测量中并未显示出额外的益处。