教学质量改进和患者安全培训:系统评价。
Teaching quality improvement and patient safety to trainees: a systematic review.
机构信息
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
出版信息
Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1425-39. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e2d0c6.
PURPOSE
To systematically review published quality improvement (QI) and patient safety (PS) curricula for medical students and/or residents to (1) determine educational content and teaching methods, (2) assess learning outcomes achieved, and (3) identify factors promoting or hindering curricular implementation.
METHOD
Data sources included Medline (to January 2009), EMBASE, HealthSTAR, and article bibliographies. Studies selected reported curricula outlining specific educational content and teaching format. For articles with an evaluative component, the authors abstracted methodological features, such as study design. For all articles, they conducted a thematic analysis to identify factors influencing successful implementation of the included curricula.
RESULTS
Of 41 curricula that met the authors' criteria, 14 targeted medical students, 24 targeted residents, and 3 targeted both. Common educational content included continuous QI, root cause analysis, and systems thinking. Among 27 reports that included an evaluation, curricula were generally well accepted. Most curricula demonstrated improved knowledge. Thirteen studies (32%) successfully implemented local changes in care delivery, and seven (17%) significantly improved target processes of care. Factors that affected the successful curricular implementation included having sufficient numbers of faculty familiar with QI and PS content, addressing competing educational demands, and ensuring learners' buy-in and enthusiasm. Participants in some curricula also commented on discrepancies between curricular material and local institutional practice or culture.
CONCLUSIONS
QI and PS curricula that target trainees usually improve learners' knowledge and frequently result in changes in clinical processes. However, successfully implementing such curricula requires attention to a number of learner, faculty, and organizational factors.
目的
系统地回顾已发表的针对医学生和/或住院医师的质量改进(QI)和患者安全(PS)课程,以(1)确定教育内容和教学方法,(2)评估所取得的学习成果,以及(3)确定促进或阻碍课程实施的因素。
方法
资料来源包括 Medline(截至 2009 年 1 月)、EMBASE、HealthSTAR 和文章参考文献。选择的研究报告了概述具体教育内容和教学形式的课程。对于有评估部分的文章,作者提取了方法学特征,如研究设计。对于所有文章,作者进行了主题分析,以确定影响纳入课程成功实施的因素。
结果
在符合作者标准的 41 项课程中,14 项针对医学生,24 项针对住院医师,3 项同时针对两者。常见的教育内容包括持续的 QI、根本原因分析和系统思维。在包括评估的 27 份报告中,课程通常受到好评。大多数课程都提高了知识水平。13 项研究(32%)成功实施了医疗服务提供方面的当地改变,7 项(17%)显著改善了目标医疗过程。影响课程成功实施的因素包括拥有足够数量熟悉 QI 和 PS 内容的教师、解决竞争教育需求以及确保学习者的认同和积极性。一些课程的参与者还对课程材料与当地机构实践或文化之间的差异发表了评论。
结论
针对受训者的 QI 和 PS 课程通常会提高学习者的知识水平,并且经常导致临床流程的改变。然而,成功实施此类课程需要关注许多学习者、教师和组织因素。