• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实习生早期参与质量改进项目能否提高他们的质量改进技能?

Does Early Involvement of Interns in a Quality Improvement Project Enhance Their Quality Improvement Skills?

作者信息

Hrach Christine, Mink Richard

机构信息

is Associate Pediatric Residency Program Director and Professor of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.

is a Professor of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA.

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Jun;17(3):353-356. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00614.1. Epub 2025 Jun 16.

DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-24-00614.1
PMID:40529285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12168971/
Abstract

Teaching quality improvement (QI) is required, and earlier exposure might improve QI skills. To examine whether interns assigned to an existing QI project early in training will have increased QI knowledge and confidence at the end of internship and require less supervision to conduct QI activities at the conclusion of residency compared with those who design their own project or join one later. In 2019, all pediatric interns were randomized to joining an ongoing QI project in the second quarter of internship (EARLY; n=16) or joining or creating one by the end of internship (LATER; n=15). QI skills were assessed at the beginning and end of internship using the AQIKS (Assessment of Quality Improvement Knowledge and Skills) and a 9-item QI self-assessment survey. At the end of residency, faculty mentors rated the amount of supervision needed to conduct a QI project using a 5-level scale. At baseline, the groups were similar in AQIKS score, self-assessment, and previous QI experience. AQIKS scores increased over the internship year in EARLY (mean improvement 4.57; 95% CI, 1.85-7.30), but not in LATER (1.83; 95% CI, -0.64-4.31). EARLY interns improved in all 9 self-assessment items, whereas those in LATER improved in only 3. At the end of residency, LATER residents generally required less supervision to conduct QI projects compared with EARLY. In the short term, assigning interns to a QI project early in internship improved their QI knowledge and confidence but not their ability to conduct QI studies without some supervision at the conclusion of residency.

摘要

教学质量改进(QI)是必要的,更早接触可能会提高QI技能。为了研究与那些自行设计项目或之后才参与项目的实习生相比,在培训早期被分配到现有QI项目的实习生在实习结束时是否会有更多的QI知识和信心,以及在住院医师培训结束时进行QI活动所需的监督是否更少。2019年,所有儿科实习生被随机分为在实习第二季度加入一个正在进行的QI项目(早期组;n = 16)或在实习结束时加入或创建一个项目(后期组;n = 15)。在实习开始和结束时,使用AQIKS(质量改进知识和技能评估)和一项9项的QI自我评估调查来评估QI技能。在住院医师培训结束时,教员导师使用5级量表对进行QI项目所需的监督量进行评分。在基线时,两组在AQIKS分数、自我评估和先前的QI经验方面相似。早期组的AQIKS分数在实习年度有所增加(平均提高4.57;95%CI,1.85 - 7.30),而后期组没有增加(1.83;95%CI, - 0.64 - 4.31)。早期组实习生在所有9项自我评估项目中都有改进,而后期组仅在3项中有改进。在住院医师培训结束时,与早期组相比,后期组住院医师在进行QI项目时通常需要的监督更少。短期内,在实习早期将实习生分配到QI项目可提高他们的QI知识和信心,但在住院医师培训结束时,在没有一些监督的情况下,他们进行QI研究的能力并没有提高。

相似文献

1
Does Early Involvement of Interns in a Quality Improvement Project Enhance Their Quality Improvement Skills?实习生早期参与质量改进项目能否提高他们的质量改进技能?
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Jun;17(3):353-356. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00614.1. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
4
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening.提高糖尿病视网膜病变筛查参与率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 15;1(1):CD012054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012054.pub2.
7
A systematic review of the effects of residency training on patient outcomes.一项关于住院医师培训对患者结局影响的系统评价。
BMC Med. 2012 Jun 28;10:65. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-65.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Practical strategies to enhance resident engagement in clinical quality improvement.提高住院医师参与临床质量改进的实用策略。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03134-y.
2
The ingredients of a rich entrustment decision.丰富委托决策的要素。
Med Teach. 2020 Dec;42(12):1413-1420. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1817348. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
Pediatric Quality Improvement (QI) Virtual Practicum: Adapting a QI Simulator.儿科质量改进(QI)虚拟实习:适应 QI 模拟器。
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Aug 14;16:10929. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10929.
4
The State of Quality Improvement Teaching in Medical Schools: A Systematic Review.医学院校质量改进教学状况:一项系统评价
J Surg Educ. 2020 Jul-Aug;77(4):889-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
5
Validity of Level of Supervision Scales for Assessing Pediatric Fellows on the Common Pediatric Subspecialty Entrustable Professional Activities.用于评估儿科住院医师在常见儿科亚专业可托付专业活动中的监督水平量表的有效性。
Acad Med. 2018 Feb;93(2):283-291. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001820.
6
Validity and Reliability of a Tool to Assess Quality Improvement Knowledge and Skills in Pediatrics Residents.评估儿科住院医师质量改进知识与技能工具的效度和信度
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Feb;9(1):79-84. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00799.1.
7
The Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R).修订后的质量改进知识应用工具(QIKAT-R)
Acad Med. 2014 Oct;89(10):1386-91. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000456.
8
Use of the Quality Improvement (QI) Knowledge Application Tool in Assessing Pediatric Resident QI Education.质量改进(QI)知识应用工具在评估儿科住院医师QI教育中的应用
J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Jun;6(2):284-91. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00221.1.
9
Evaluation of a quality improvement curriculum for family medicine residents.对家庭医学住院医师质量改进课程的评估。
Fam Med. 2013 Jan;45(1):19-25.
10
Quality improvement in medical education: current state and future directions.医学教育质量改进:现状与未来方向。
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):107-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04154.x.