• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating the implementation of a longitudinal cocurricular experiential quality improvement training programme for undergraduate medical students.评估一项针对本科医学生的纵向课外体验式质量改进培训计划的实施情况。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jul 31;14(3):e003378. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003378.
2
Bridging early medical education and health systems improvement: a multi-faceted faculty development program to enhance engagement and impact.衔接早期医学教育与卫生系统改善:一项旨在提高参与度和影响力的多方面教师发展计划。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 25;25(1):1112. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07579-9.
3
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
4
A Comprehensive and Modality Diverse Cervical Spine and Back Musculoskeletal Physical Exam Curriculum for Medical Students.面向医学生的全面且多模态的颈椎和背部肌肉骨骼物理检查课程
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 31;10(3):SG1-SG8. doi: 10.21980/J8RQ0N. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
6
Improving Cognitive Empathy Through Traumatic Brain Injury Experiential Learning: A Novel Mixed Methods Approach for Speech-Language Pathology Graduate Education.通过创伤性脑损伤体验式学习提高认知同理心:一种用于言语语言病理学研究生教育的新型混合方法。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jan 13:1-33. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00126.
7
Learning together for mental health: feasibility of measures to assess a whole-school mental health and wellbeing intervention in secondary schools.共同学习促进心理健康:评估中学全校心理健康与幸福干预措施的可行性
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 25:1-18. doi: 10.3310/GFDT2323.
8
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
9
Integration of early clinical exposure into curriculum enhances self-assessment of professional competencies in medical practice.将早期临床接触融入课程体系可提高医学实践中专业能力的自我评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):1139. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07678-7.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

本文引用的文献

1
CanMEDS, quality improvement, and residency: mind the gap.加拿大医学教育目标框架、质量改进与住院医师培训:关注差距。
Can Med Educ J. 2023 Apr 8;14(2):171-172. doi: 10.36834/cmej.75483. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Using QI Methodology to Improve a Program's QI Curriculum: An Educational Improvement Project.运用质量改进方法改进项目的质量改进课程:一项教育改进项目。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2022 Sep 8;7(5):e598. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000598. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
3
Reduction of urea test ordering in the emergency department: multicomponent intervention including education, electronic ordering, and data feedback.减少急诊科尿素检测的开单量:包括教育、电子开单和数据反馈在内的多组分干预措施。
CJEM. 2022 Sep;24(6):636-640. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00333-w. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
4
Win-win: Summer QI programme for medical students.双赢:医学生暑期交流项目。
Clin Teach. 2022 Jun;19(3):240-246. doi: 10.1111/tct.13473. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
5
Implementation of a Quality and Patient Safety Curriculum for Pathology Residency Training.病理学住院医师培训质量与患者安全课程的实施
Acad Pathol. 2021 Mar 18;8:2374289521998046. doi: 10.1177/2374289521998046. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
6
QIPS CURE: Implementing a Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Curriculum and Resident Experience.QIPS CURE:实施质量改进和患者安全课程及住院医师体验。
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Aug;12(4):469-477. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00612.1.
7
Efficacy of quality improvement and patient safety workshops for students: a pilot study.针对学生的质量改进与患者安全工作坊的效果:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 23;20(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1982-3.
8
The State of Quality Improvement Teaching in Medical Schools: A Systematic Review.医学院校质量改进教学状况:一项系统评价
J Surg Educ. 2020 Jul-Aug;77(4):889-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
An Interactive Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Workshop for First-Year Medical Students.面向一年级医学生的互动式质量改进与患者安全研讨会。
MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Aug 3;14:10734. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10734.
10
From Modules to MOOCs: Application of the Six-Step Approach to Online Curriculum Development for Medical Education.从模块到 MOOCs:六步方法在医学教育在线课程开发中的应用。
Acad Med. 2019 May;94(5):678-685. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002580.

评估一项针对本科医学生的纵向课外体验式质量改进培训计划的实施情况。

Evaluating the implementation of a longitudinal cocurricular experiential quality improvement training programme for undergraduate medical students.

作者信息

Bailey Katherine, Farahani Elina, Raval Sunny, Lin Ke Xin, Nasser Muhammadhasan, Hersh Jonathan, Khan Farah, Chugh Shaan, Sharfuddin Nazia

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jul 31;14(3):e003378. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003378.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003378
PMID:40744650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12314928/
Abstract

Quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) is a core competency in undergraduate medical education. While didactic and experiential learning enhance QIPS knowledge and skills, there are limited experiential opportunities. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a longitudinal didactic and experiential student-led programme, Quality Improvement Experiential Student Training (QuEST). QuEST was piloted during year 1, where learners completed online modules, didactic seminars, an experiential project and mentorship meetings with the programme's faculty chair (Plan-Do-Study-Act [PDSA] 1). We implemented a formal leadership structure, adapted the curriculum, and changed mentorship meetings to student-led in year 2 (PDSA 2). In response to reduced learner satisfaction, we reintroduced faculty-led mentorship meetings in year 3 as well as revised the experiential project screening process and decreased the cohort size to enhance programme operations. The outcome was self-reported confidence in completing a QIPS project, which we aimed to achieve at least 60% of learners reporting confidence each year. Fourteen learners were enrolled in year 1, 45 in year 2 and 18 in year 3. After year 1, 86% of learners reported confidence in completing a QIPS project (from 39% preprogramme; p<0.01), 64% in year 2 (from 16%; p<0.01) and 75% in year 3 (from 28%; p<0.01). Programme satisfaction was 4.25/5 in year 1, 4.27/5 in year 2 and 4.75/5 in year 3. Strengths included experiential learning and support from the programme. Opportunities for improvement included further check-in meetings to promote accountability and project progression. The QuEST programme equipped learners with the confidence needed to complete a QIPS project. The provision of mentorship was identified as a common driver for learner satisfaction, with the suggestion to provide further structured and unstructured mentorship opportunities embedded in the programme. Future work may consider longitudinally assessing changes to learner behaviour.

摘要

质量改进与患者安全(QIPS)是本科医学教育的一项核心能力。虽然理论教学和实践学习能增强QIPS知识与技能,但实践机会有限。本研究旨在评估一项由学生主导的纵向理论与实践项目——质量改进实践学生培训(QuEST)的可行性和有效性。QuEST在第1年进行试点,学习者完成在线模块、理论研讨会、一个实践项目以及与该项目的教师主席进行指导会议(计划-执行-研究-行动[PDSA]1)。我们在第2年实施了正式的领导结构,调整了课程,并将指导会议改为由学生主导(PDSA 2)。由于学习者满意度降低,我们在第3年重新引入了由教师主导的指导会议,修订了实践项目筛选流程,并缩小了 cohort规模以优化项目运作。结果是自我报告的完成QIPS项目的信心,我们的目标是每年至少60%的学习者报告有信心。第1年有14名学习者入学,第2年有45名,第3年有18名。第1年后,86%的学习者报告有信心完成QIPS项目(项目前为39%;p<0.01),第2年为64%(从16%;p<0.01),第3年为75%(从28%;p<0.01)。项目满意度第1年为4.25/5,第2年为4.27/5,第3年为4.75/5。优点包括实践学习和项目支持。改进机会包括进一步的跟进会议以促进问责制和项目进展。QuEST项目使学习者具备了完成QIPS项目所需的信心。提供指导被认为是学习者满意度的一个共同驱动因素,并建议在项目中提供更多结构化和非结构化的指导机会。未来的工作可以考虑纵向评估学习者行为上的变化。