Suppr超能文献

腹壁关闭:住院医师教育和人为错误。

Abdominal wall closure: resident education and human error.

机构信息

South East Area Health Education Center, Department of Surgery, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC 28401, USA.

出版信息

Hernia. 2010 Oct;14(5):463-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0691-y. Epub 2010 Jun 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Secure abdominal wall closure for laparotomy incisions is paramount in prevention of hernia formation. Despite the importance, abdominal closure is often delegated to the resident surgeon. The purpose of this study was to assess residents' formal training, knowledge, and technique in abdominal wall closure.

METHODS

All surgical residents in our training program participated in a skills laboratory and completed a questionnaire. The skills portion involved closure of a 10-cm incision on a simulated abdominal wall. Participants were timed, videotaped, and graded using a standardized grading system. Lengths of the suture bites were measured. Regression analysis was used to compare results based on number of closures. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Ten surgical residents participated. The average time for closure was 4:23 min (range 3:08-5:65 min). The average distance between the bite and the incision was 0.9 cm and between bites was 0.8 cm. All knots were satisfactory and intact following closure. Participants' experience varied with a range from 0 to 230 previous abdominal closures. All residents chose to perform closure in a continuous fashion using a slowly absorbing suture. All but one resident stated that sutures should be placed 1 cm from the incision with 1 cm advances. Only one resident knew the correct suture-to-wound length ratio for closure, and only four residents were familiar with the literature about abdominal wall closure. With increasing closure experience, there was significant improvement in time and motion of suturing (P = 0.02), respect of tissue (P = 0.0002), instrument handling (P = 0.004), orientation of needle (P = 0.0076), and flow of closure (P = 0.046). Residents who had performed more closures took significantly larger suture bites (P = 0.03) with larger distances between bites (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical technique improves with increased experience with abdominal closures; however, residents at all levels have the physical ability to adequately perform this task. Education regarding closure appears to be lacking, and further study warranted.

摘要

目的

确保剖腹切口的腹壁闭合对于预防疝形成至关重要。尽管这一点很重要,但腹壁闭合通常还是交给住院医师来完成。本研究旨在评估住院医师在腹壁闭合方面的正规培训、知识和技术。

方法

我们培训计划中的所有外科住院医师都参加了技能实验室,并完成了一份问卷。技能部分包括在模拟腹壁上闭合 10 厘米长的切口。参与者的用时、录像和评分均使用标准化评分系统进行。测量缝合的进针长度。基于闭合次数进行回归分析来比较结果。P 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

10 名外科住院医师参与了研究。平均闭合时间为 4:23 分钟(范围 3:08-5:65 分钟)。切口和进针之间的平均距离为 0.9 厘米,进针之间的距离为 0.8 厘米。所有的结都在闭合后保持满意且完整。参与者的经验从 0 次到 230 次之前的腹部闭合不等。所有住院医师都选择使用可吸收缝线连续缝合。除 1 名住院医师外,所有住院医师都表示缝线应距离切口 1 厘米,进针 1 厘米。只有 1 名住院医师知道正确的缝合线与伤口长度比用于闭合,只有 4 名住院医师熟悉关于腹壁闭合的文献。随着闭合经验的增加,缝合的时间和动作明显改善(P=0.02),对组织的尊重(P=0.0002),器械操作(P=0.004),针的方向(P=0.0076)和闭合的流畅度(P=0.046)。进行过更多闭合操作的住院医师进针更大(P=0.03),进针之间的距离更大(P=0.03)。

结论

随着腹部闭合经验的增加,手术技术会有所提高;但是,各级住院医师都有足够的能力完成这项任务。关于闭合的教育似乎不足,需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验