• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双水平正压通气在表面活性物质治疗早产儿中的应用

Role of bilevel positive airway pressure in the management of preterm newborns who have received surfactant.

机构信息

Department of Woman, Child and Adolescent Health, Sant'Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2010 Dec;99(12):1807-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01910.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01910.x
PMID:20545934
Abstract

AIM

Surfactant given during brief intubation followed by immediate extubation on nasal continuous positive airway pressure [Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation (InSurE) approach] is used to treat respiratory distress syndrome in newborns. Our aim was to evaluate whether bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) after InSurE failure is able to prevent the need for mechanical ventilation (MV).

METHODS

Chart data of infants with a birth weight <1500 gr or GA <32weeks undergoing InSurE in the period 2002-2008 in an Italian Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit were reviewed retrospectively. InSurE failure was defined as follows: FiO(2) >0.4, respiratory acidosis or intractable apnoea within 1 week. After InSurE failure, newborns born before the implementation of BiPAP (historical control group) received MV, whereas those born after BiPAP implementation (BiPAP group) received BiPAP and underwent MV only if failure criteria persisted. The two groups were compared to evaluate whether BiPAP reduced the need for MV in the 7 days after InSurE failure.

RESULTS

Six of twenty-two (27%) and 14 of the 38 (37%) infants failed InSurE in the two groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Need for MV was 27% in the historical control group versus 0% in the BiPAP group (risk estimate, 3.38; 95% CI, 2.24, 5.09; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

BiPAP reduced the need for MV after InSurE failure.

摘要

目的

在经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)下进行短暂插管后给予表面活性剂(Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation [InSurE] 方法),用于治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征。我们的目的是评估 InSurE 失败后使用双相气道正压通气(BiPAP)是否能够预防需要机械通气(MV)。

方法

回顾性分析 2002 年至 2008 年期间在意大利三级新生儿重症监护病房接受 InSurE 治疗、出生体重 <1500g 或胎龄 <32 周的婴儿的图表数据。InSurE 失败定义为:FiO(2) >0.4、呼吸性酸中毒或 1 周内难以控制的呼吸暂停。InSurE 失败后,在 BiPAP 实施前出生的新生儿(历史对照组)接受 MV,而在 BiPAP 实施后出生的新生儿(BiPAP 组)接受 BiPAP,如果失败标准持续存在则接受 MV。比较两组以评估 BiPAP 是否降低 InSurE 失败后 7 天内 MV 的需求。

结果

两组中分别有 6 例(27%)和 14 例(37%)婴儿 InSurE 失败(p>0.05)。历史对照组需要 MV 的比例为 27%,BiPAP 组为 0%(风险估计值,3.38;95%CI,2.24,5.09;p=0.001)。

结论

BiPAP 降低了 InSurE 失败后 MV 的需求。

相似文献

1
Role of bilevel positive airway pressure in the management of preterm newborns who have received surfactant.双水平正压通气在表面活性物质治疗早产儿中的应用
Acta Paediatr. 2010 Dec;99(12):1807-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01910.x.
2
Risk factors for INSURE failure in preterm infants.早产儿INSURE失败的危险因素。
Minerva Pediatr. 2010 Jun;62(3 Suppl 1):19-20.
3
Minimally invasive surfactant therapy with a gastric tube is as effective as the intubation, surfactant, and extubation technique in preterm babies.在早产儿中,采用胃管进行微创表面活性剂治疗与插管、注入表面活性剂和拔管技术的效果相同。
Acta Paediatr. 2014 Jun;103(6):e229-33. doi: 10.1111/apa.12611. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
4
Bi-level Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) for Preterm Infants with Birth Weight Less Than 1500 g and Respiratory Distress Syndrome Following INSURE Treatment: A Two-center Randomized Controlled Trial.经 INSURE 治疗后体重小于 1500 克的伴有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿使用双水平鼻气道正压通气(BiPAP)与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的效果比较:一项两中心随机对照试验。
Curr Med Sci. 2021 Jun;41(3):542-547. doi: 10.1007/s11596-021-2372-8. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
5
Risk factors for intubation-surfactant-extubation (INSURE) failure and multiple INSURE strategy in preterm infants.经口插管-表面活性物质-拔管(INSURE)失败的危险因素和早产儿多次 INSURE 策略。
Early Hum Dev. 2012 Mar;88 Suppl 1:S3-4. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.12.019. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
6
[Application of three kinds of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial].[三种无创正压通气作为呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿主要通气模式的应用:一项随机对照试验]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;52(1):34-40.
7
Is it feasible to identify preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome for early extubation to continuous positive airway pressure post-surfactant treatment during retrieval?在转运过程中,对于接受表面活性剂治疗后的呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿,识别出适合早期拔管并给予持续气道正压通气的患儿是否可行?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Mar;51(3):321-7. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12724. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
8
Very early surfactant without mandatory ventilation in premature infants treated with early continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized, controlled trial.极早早产儿在接受早期持续气道正压通气治疗时不进行强制通气使用表面活性剂:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):137-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3501.
9
Implementation of surfactant treatment during continuous positive airway pressure.在持续气道正压通气期间实施表面活性剂治疗。
J Perinatol. 2007 Jul;27(7):422-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211754. Epub 2007 May 3.
10
Efficacy of INSURE during nasal CPAP in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.持续气道正压通气期间INSURE策略用于呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的疗效
Minerva Pediatr. 2013 Apr;65(2):187-92.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of intratracheal salbutamol in addition to surfactant on the clinical course of newborns with respiratory distress syndrome: a clinical trial.气管内使用沙丁胺醇联合表面活性剂对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征临床病程的疗效:一项临床试验
Ital J Pediatr. 2016 Jan 19;42:6. doi: 10.1186/s13052-016-0215-1.
2
Economic and health consequences of non-invasive respiratory support in newborn infants: a difference-in-difference analysis using data from the Norwegian patient registry.新生儿无创呼吸支持的经济和健康后果:一项使用挪威患者登记数据的双重差分分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 1;14:494. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0494-4.
3
Bi-level CPAP does not change central blood flow in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.
双水平气道正压通气不会改变呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的中央血流。
Ital J Pediatr. 2014 Jun 21;40:60. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-40-60.
4
Predictors for an unsuccessful INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation procedure: a cohort study.预测经口气管插管-表面活性物质-拔管失败的因素:一项队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jun 19;14:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-155.
5
Early surfactant therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure or continued mechanical ventilation in very low birth weight neonates with respiratory distress syndrome.极低出生体重儿呼吸窘迫综合征早期使用表面活性剂治疗联合经鼻持续气道正压通气或持续机械通气。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Apr;16(4):e12206. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.12206. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
6
Sedation of newborn infants for the INSURE procedure, are we sure?为INSURE操作对新生儿进行镇静,我们确定吗?
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:892974. doi: 10.1155/2013/892974. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
7
Neonatal respiratory support strategies in the intensive care unit: an Italian survey.新生儿重症监护病房的呼吸支持策略:一项意大利调查。
Eur J Pediatr. 2013 Mar;172(3):331-6. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1885-3. Epub 2012 Nov 14.