Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Invest Radiol. 2010 Nov;45(11):708-14. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181e5bbb0.
The combination of parallel acquisition (generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions) and time-resolved three-dimensional (3D) view-sharing techniques is a promising tool for dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). We evaluated the influence of different k-space acquisition strategies on image quality for a recently developed time-resolved echo-shared angiographic technique during a contrast-enhanced 3D-MRA of the thoracic vessels.
In 20 patients (16 men, 4 women; range, 28-75 years), 2 dynamic MRA protocols with different k-space acquisition strategies were performed on a 1.5-T whole-body scanner (MAGNETOM Avanto, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) during injection of 5 mL (flow-rate, 3 mL/s) gadobutrol. For protocol 1, the central-region which was updated with every cycle included 20% of the entire k-space (protocol 2: 10%), the peripheral-region was undersampled by a factor of 10 (protocol 2: 5%). Image quality and details were compared visually. Signal-to-noise ratio and sharpness of vessel borders were estimated.
Morphologic and functional assessment of the pulmonary arteries and the aorta was significantly improved for protocol 1. The sharpness of vessel borders (3.3 mm vs. 4.1 mm; P = 0.001), image quality, and the visibility of image details were significantly improved for protocol 1 compared with protocol 2.
The size of the central region that is updated for every frame seems to be more crucial for image quality of echo-shared angiographic techniques than the sampling density in the periphery of the k-space.
并行采集(广义自校准部分并行采集)与时间分辨三维(3D)容积共享技术的结合是动态对比增强 3D-MRA 的一种很有前途的工具。我们评估了不同的 K 空间采集策略对最近开发的时间分辨共享血管造影技术在对比增强 3D-MRA 中对胸部血管的图像质量的影响。
在 20 例患者(男 16 例,女 4 例;年龄 28-75 岁)中,在 1.5-T 全身扫描仪(MAGNETOM Avanto,西门子 AG,德国埃朗根)上进行了两种不同 K 空间采集策略的 2 项动态 MRA 协议,在注射 5mL(流速 3mL/s)钆布醇时进行。对于协议 1,用每周期更新的中心区域包括整个 K 空间的 20%(协议 2:10%),外围区域欠采样因子为 10(协议 2:5%)。比较了视觉图像质量和细节。估计了信噪比和血管边界的锐度。
协议 1 明显改善了肺动脉和主动脉的形态和功能评估。与协议 2 相比,协议 1 的血管边界锐度(3.3mm 对 4.1mm;P=0.001)、图像质量和图像细节的可见度显著提高。
对于回波共享血管造影技术,每帧更新的中心区域的大小似乎比 K 空间外围的采样密度对图像质量更为关键。