• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄勒冈州医疗补助计划参保者对急诊部门使用的政策变化影响。

Impact of policy changes on emergency department use by Medicaid enrollees in Oregon.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2010 Jul;48(7):619-27. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbddb1.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbddb1
PMID:20548256
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 2003, Oregon's Medicaid expansion program, the Oregon Health Plan (OHP), implemented premiums and copayments and eliminated outpatient behavioral health services. We ascertained whether these changes, including $50 copayments for emergency department (ED) visits, affected ED use.

METHODS

This study used statewide administrative data on 414,009 adult OHP enrollees to compare ED utilization rates (adjusted for patient characteristics) in 3 time periods: (1) before the cutbacks, (2) after the cutbacks, and (3) after partial restoration of benefits. We examined overall ED visits and several subsets of ED visits: visits requiring hospital admission, injury-related, drug-related, alcohol-related, and other psychiatric visits. Because the policy changes affected only the expansion program (OHP Standard), we ascertained the impact of these changes compared with a control group of categorically eligible Medicaid enrollees (OHP Plus).

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, case-mix-adjusted ED utilization rates fell 18% among OHP Standard enrollees after the cutbacks. The rate of ED visits leading to hospitalization fell 24%. Injury-related visits and psychiatric visits excluding chemical dependency exhibited a similar pattern to overall ED visits. Drug-related ED visits increased 32% in the control group, perhaps reflecting the closure of drug treatment programs after the cutbacks reduced their revenue.

CONCLUSION

The policy changes were followed by a substantial reduction in ED use. That ED visits requiring hospital admission fell to about the same extent as overall ED use suggests that OHP enrollees may have been discouraged from using EDs for emergencies as well as less-serious problems.

摘要

目的

2003 年,俄勒冈州的医疗补助扩展计划——俄勒冈健康计划(OHP)实施了保费和共同支付,并取消了门诊行为健康服务。我们确定了这些变化,包括急诊部(ED)就诊的 50 美元共同支付,是否会影响 ED 的使用。

方法

本研究使用了全州范围内的行政数据,涉及 414,009 名 OHP 成年参保者,比较了 3 个时期的 ED 利用率(根据患者特征进行调整):(1)削减之前,(2)削减之后,以及(3)部分恢复福利之后。我们检查了总体 ED 就诊次数以及几个 ED 就诊的子集:需要住院的就诊、伤害相关的就诊、药物相关的就诊、酒精相关的就诊和其他精神科就诊。由于政策变化仅影响扩展计划(OHP Standard),我们确定了与分类合格的医疗补助参保者(OHP Plus)对照组相比,这些变化的影响。

结果

与对照组相比,削减后 OHP Standard 参保者的病例组合调整后的 ED 利用率下降了 18%。导致住院的 ED 就诊率下降了 24%。伤害相关就诊和排除药物依赖的精神科就诊呈现出与总体 ED 就诊类似的模式。药物相关的 ED 就诊在对照组中增加了 32%,这可能反映了削减后药物治疗计划的关闭减少了它们的收入。

结论

政策变化之后,ED 使用量大幅减少。需要住院的 ED 就诊率下降到与总体 ED 就诊率大致相同的程度,这表明 OHP 参保者可能被劝阻不要将 ED 用于急诊和不太严重的问题。

相似文献

1
Impact of policy changes on emergency department use by Medicaid enrollees in Oregon.俄勒冈州医疗补助计划参保者对急诊部门使用的政策变化影响。
Med Care. 2010 Jul;48(7):619-27. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbddb1.
2
Impact of Medicaid cutbacks on emergency department use: the Oregon experience.医疗补助削减对急诊科使用情况的影响:俄勒冈州的经验
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;52(6):626-634. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.335. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
3
Changes in access to primary care for Medicaid beneficiaries and the uninsured: the emergency department perspective.医疗补助受益人和未参保者获得初级医疗服务的变化:急诊科视角
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;24(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.06.009.
4
Annual report on health care for children and youth in the United States: focus on injury-related emergency department utilization and expenditures.美国儿童和青少年医疗保健年度报告:关注与伤害相关的急诊科就诊情况及支出
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):219-240.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.03.032. Epub 2008 May 27.
5
How much does emergency department use affect the cost of Medicaid programs?急诊科的使用情况对医疗补助计划的成本有多大影响?
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 May;51(5):614-21, 621.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
6
Can the emergency department algorithm detect changes in access to care?急诊科算法能否检测到医疗服务可及性的变化?
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jun;15(6):506-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00108.x.
7
Community characteristics affecting emergency department use by Medicaid enrollees.影响医疗补助计划参保者急诊科就诊情况的社区特征
Med Care. 2009 Jan;47(1):15-22. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181844e1c.
8
Placement changes and emergency department visits in the first year of foster care.寄养照护第一年中的安置变化及急诊就诊情况
Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):e354-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2003-0594-F.
9
An evaluation of statewide emergency department utilization following Tennessee Medicaid disenrollment.田纳西州医疗补助计划停保后全州急诊部门利用情况评估。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;18(11):1121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01204.x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
10
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1999 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:1999年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2001 Jun 25(320):1-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of increased reimbursement for ambulance transportation on hospital acceptance in Japan: a difference-in-difference study.提高救护车运输报销对日本医院收治的影响:一项差分研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 25;13(7):e071523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071523.
2
Insurance instability and use of emergency and office-based care after gaining coverage: An observational cohort study.获得保险覆盖后的保险不稳定和急诊及门诊护理的使用:一项观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 4;15(9):e0238100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238100. eCollection 2020.
3
Factors associated with inappropriate attendances at the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Singapore.
新加坡一家三级医院急诊科不适当就诊的相关因素。
Singapore Med J. 2020 Feb;61(2):75-80. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019041. Epub 2019 May 2.
4
Characteristics of Children Enrolled in Medicaid With High-Frequency Emergency Department Use.参加医疗补助计划且高频使用急诊科的儿童的特征。
Pediatrics. 2017 Sep;140(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0962. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
5
Updating the Emergency Department Algorithm: One Patch Is Not Enough.更新急诊科算法:一个补丁是不够的。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1257-1263. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12735.
6
Cost Sharing in Medicaid: Assumptions, Evidence, and Future Directions.医疗补助计划中的费用分担:假设、证据及未来方向。
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Aug;73(4):383-409. doi: 10.1177/1077558715617381. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
7
The impact of an emergency fee increase on the composition of patients visiting emergency departments.急诊费用增加对前往急诊科就诊患者构成的影响。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2014 Nov;47(6):309-16. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.14.044. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
8
Non-emergency department interventions to reduce ED utilization: a systematic review.非急诊部门干预措施以减少急诊部门的利用:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(10):969-85. doi: 10.1111/acem.12219.
9
Effectiveness of organizational interventions to reduce emergency department utilization: a systematic review.组织干预措施降低急诊科利用效果的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035903. Epub 2012 May 2.