David M, Bodenstein M, Markstaller K
Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Deutschland.
Anaesthesist. 2010 Jul;59(7):595-606. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1743-5.
General anesthesia and mechanical ventilation affect gas exchange, ventilation and pulmonary perfusion and there is an increasing body of evidence that mechanical ventilation itself promotes lung injury. Lung protective mechanical ventilation in patients suffering from acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome by means of reduced tidal volumes and limited plateau pressures has been shown to result in reduction of systemic inflammatory mediators, increased ventilator-free days and reduction in mortality. Experimental studies suggest that mechanical ventilation of uninjured lungs may also induce lung damage; however, the clinical relevance remains unknown. Human prospective studies comparing mechanical ventilation strategies during general anesthesia have shown inconsistent results with respect to inflammatory mediators. There is a lack of clinical evidence that lung protective ventilation strategies as used in patients with lung injury may improve clinical outcome of patients with uninjured lungs. The question of which ventilatory strategy will best protect normal human lungs remains unanswered.
全身麻醉和机械通气会影响气体交换、通气和肺灌注,并且越来越多的证据表明机械通气本身会促进肺损伤。通过降低潮气量和限制平台压对急性肺损伤或急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者实施肺保护性机械通气,已被证明可减少全身炎症介质、增加无呼吸机天数并降低死亡率。实验研究表明,对未受伤的肺进行机械通气也可能导致肺损伤;然而,其临床相关性尚不清楚。比较全身麻醉期间机械通气策略的人体前瞻性研究在炎症介质方面显示出不一致的结果。缺乏临床证据表明,用于肺损伤患者的肺保护性通气策略可改善未受伤肺患者的临床结局。哪种通气策略能最佳保护正常人类肺脏的问题仍未得到解答。