Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R1. doi: 10.1186/cc8230. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
Recent cohort studies have identified the use of large tidal volumes as a major risk factor for development of lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients without acute lung injury (ALI). We compared the effect of conventional with lower tidal volumes on pulmonary inflammation and development of lung injury in critically ill patients without ALI at the onset of mechanical ventilation.
We performed a randomized controlled nonblinded preventive trial comparing mechanical ventilation with tidal volumes of 10 ml versus 6 ml per kilogram of predicted body weight in critically ill patients without ALI at the onset of mechanical ventilation. The primary end point was cytokine levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and plasma during mechanical ventilation. The secondary end point was the development of lung injury, as determined by consensus criteria for ALI, duration of mechanical ventilation, and mortality.
One hundred fifty patients (74 conventional versus 76 lower tidal volume) were enrolled and analyzed. No differences were observed in lavage fluid cytokine levels at baseline between the randomization groups. Plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels decreased significantly more strongly in the lower-tidal-volume group ((from 51 (20 to 182) ng/ml to 11 (5 to 20) ng/ml versus 50 (21 to 122) ng/ml to 21 (20 to 77) ng/ml; P = 0.01)). The trial was stopped prematurely for safety reasons because the development of lung injury was higher in the conventional tidal-volume group as compared with the lower tidal-volume group (13.5% versus 2.6%; P = 0.01). Univariate analysis showed statistical relations between baseline lung-injury score, randomization group, level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), the number of transfused blood products, the presence of a risk factor for ALI, and baseline IL-6 lavage fluid levels and the development of lung injury. Multivariate analysis revealed the randomization group and the level of PEEP as independent predictors of the development of lung injury.
Mechanical ventilation with conventional tidal volumes is associated with sustained cytokine production, as measured in plasma. Our data suggest that mechanical ventilation with conventional tidal volumes contributes to the development of lung injury in patients without ALI at the onset of mechanical ventilation.
ISRCTN82533884.
最近的队列研究已经确定,在没有急性肺损伤(ALI)的机械通气患者中,使用大潮气量是导致肺损伤发展的主要危险因素。我们比较了常规潮气量与较低潮气量对机械通气开始时无 ALI 的危重病患者肺部炎症和肺损伤发展的影响。
我们进行了一项随机对照非盲预防试验,比较了机械通气时潮气量为 10ml/kg 预测体重与 6ml/kg 预测体重对机械通气开始时无 ALI 的危重病患者的影响。主要终点是机械通气期间支气管肺泡灌洗液和血浆中的细胞因子水平。次要终点是根据 ALI 的共识标准确定的肺损伤发展、机械通气时间和死亡率。
共纳入并分析了 150 例患者(常规组 74 例,低潮气量组 76 例)。两组随机分组时灌洗液细胞因子水平无差异。低潮气量组血浆白细胞介素 6(IL-6)水平下降更为明显(从 51(20 至 182)ng/ml 降至 11(5 至 20)ng/ml,而 50(21 至 122)ng/ml 降至 21(20 至 77)ng/ml;P=0.01)。由于常规潮气量组与低潮气量组相比肺损伤发生率较高(13.5%比 2.6%;P=0.01),出于安全原因提前终止了试验。单因素分析显示,基线肺损伤评分、随机分组、呼气末正压(PEEP)水平、输血量、ALI 危险因素、基线 IL-6 灌洗液水平与肺损伤的发生存在统计学关系。多因素分析显示,随机分组和 PEEP 水平是肺损伤发生的独立预测因素。
使用常规潮气量进行机械通气与血浆中持续的细胞因子产生有关。我们的数据表明,在机械通气开始时无 ALI 的患者中,常规潮气量机械通气有助于肺损伤的发展。
ISRCTN82533884。