• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Towards global age-friendly cities: determining urban features that promote active aging.迈向全球宜居城市:确定促进积极老龄化的城市特征。
J Urban Health. 2010 Sep;87(5):733-9. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9466-0.
2
Developing age-friendly cities: case studies from Brussels and Manchester and implications for policy and practice.发展适合老年人的城市:来自布鲁塞尔和曼彻斯特的案例研究及其对政策与实践的启示
J Aging Soc Policy. 2014;26(1-2):52-72. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2014.855043.
3
Age-Friendly Cities During a Global Pandemic.全球大流行期间的友好型城市。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Dec 1;46(12):7-13. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20201106-02.
4
Is a healthy city also an age-friendly city?健康城市是否也是适宜老年人生活的城市?
Health Promot Int. 2015 Jun;30 Suppl 1:i108-i117. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav039.
5
A Manifesto for the Age-Friendly Movement: Developing a New Urban Agenda.《积极老龄化运动宣言:制定新的城市议程》。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 Mar-Apr;30(2):173-192. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1430414.
6
Combining the Digital, Social and Physical Layer to Create Age-Friendly Cities and Communities.将数字、社会和物理层相结合,打造友好型老年城市和社区。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 5;18(1):325. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010325.
7
Current Status and Policy Planning for Promoting Age-Friendly Cities in Taitung County: Dialogue Between Older Adults and Service Providers.推动台东市高龄友善城市之现况与政策规划:高龄者与服务提供者之对话。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 21;15(10):2314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102314.
8
Age-Friendly Portland: a university-city-community partnership.波特兰友善老龄化:大学-城市-社区伙伴关系
J Aging Soc Policy. 2014;26(1-2):88-101. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2014.854651.
9
How Can the Lived Environment Support Healthy Ageing? A Spatial Indicators Framework for the Assessment of Age-Friendly Communities.生活环境如何支持健康老龄化?评估宜居社区的空间指标框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;17(20):7685. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207685.
10
Sustaining Chicago's Informal Caregivers: an Age-Friendly Approach.支持芝加哥的非正式护理人员:一种关爱老年人的方法。
J Urban Health. 2016 Aug;93(4):639-51. doi: 10.1007/s11524-016-0058-5.

引用本文的文献

1
How the Age-Friendly Domains Apply to Low-Income Cities and Guide Improvements: Perspectives of Long-Term Residents in New Jersey.老年友好领域如何适用于低收入城市并指导改进:新泽西长期居民的观点
Public Opin Q. 2025 Aug 7;89(SI):517-538. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfaf027. eCollection 2025.
2
Multidimensional Evaluation of the Process of Constructing Age-Friendly Communities Among Different Aged Community Residents in Beijing, China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.中国北京不同年龄段社区居民构建老年友好型社区过程的多维评估:横断面问卷调查研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Mar 21;11:e66248. doi: 10.2196/66248.
3
Relationship between Internet use and offline leisure activities among Chinese older adult people: a moderated mediation model.中国老年人互联网使用与线下休闲活动之间的关系:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 8;12:1458413. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1458413. eCollection 2024.
4
Measuring the age-friendliness of cities in the Russian Federation: The translation, validation and application of the age-friendly cities and communities Questionnaire in the city of Kazan.衡量俄罗斯联邦城市的年龄友好度:在喀山市对年龄友好型城市与社区问卷进行翻译、验证及应用。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 10;11(1):e41100. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41100. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
5
The Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire: A validation study of the Hebrew version in Israel.《老年友好型城市与社区调查问卷:希伯来语版本在以色列的效度研究》
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 11;10(23):e39182. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39182. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
6
Active Aging and Smart Public Parks.积极老龄化与智能城市公园
Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Sep 22;8(5):94. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8050094.
7
Age-Friendly Approach Is Necessary to Prevent Depopulation: Resident Architectural Designers and Constructors' Evaluation of the Age-Friendliness of Japanese Municipalities.老龄化友好型方法是防止人口减少的必要手段:居民建筑设计师和施工人员对日本市政的老龄化友好程度的评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 22;20(17):6626. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20176626.
8
Age Friendly Characteristics and Sense of Community of an Italian City: The Case of Macerata.适合老年人居住的特点和意大利城市的社区意识:马切拉塔案例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 17;20(10):5847. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105847.
9
Age-Friendly Cities in Latin America: A Human Ecological Framework.拉丁美洲的友好型城市:一个人类生态框架。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;8(3):46. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8030046.
10
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status, Green Space, and Walkability and Risk for Falls Among Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative.社区社会经济地位、绿地和可步行性与绝经后妇女跌倒风险:妇女健康倡议。
Womens Health Issues. 2023 Jul-Aug;33(4):443-458. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 May 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Creating elder-friendly communities: preparations for an aging society.创建老年友好型社区:为老龄化社会做准备。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2007;49(1-2):1-18. doi: 10.1300/j083v49n01_01.
2
Promoting healthy aging in cities: the Healthy Cities project in Europe.
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 1997 Dec;12(4):287-98. doi: 10.1023/a:1006539003961.
3
Developing community indicators to promote the health and well-being of older people.制定社区指标以促进老年人的健康和福祉。
Fam Community Health. 2003 Oct-Dec;26(4):268-74. doi: 10.1097/00003727-200310000-00004.

迈向全球宜居城市:确定促进积极老龄化的城市特征。

Towards global age-friendly cities: determining urban features that promote active aging.

机构信息

Centre for Health Promotion, Division of Aging and Seniors, Public Health Agency of Canada, 200 Eglantine Driveway, Ottawa, ON, K1A 1B4, Canada.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2010 Sep;87(5):733-9. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9466-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11524-010-9466-0
PMID:20549569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2937125/
Abstract

At the same time as cities are growing, their share of older residents is increasing. To engage and assist cities to become more "age-friendly," the World Health Organization (WHO) prepared the Global Age-Friendly Cities Guide and a companion "Checklist of Essential Features of Age-Friendly Cities". In collaboration with partners in 35 cities from developed and developing countries, WHO determined the features of age-friendly cities in eight domains of urban life: outdoor spaces and buildings; transportation; housing; social participation; respect and social inclusion; civic participation and employment; communication and information; and community support and health services. In 33 cities, partners conducted 158 focus groups with persons aged 60 years and older from lower- and middle-income areas of a locally defined geographic area (n = 1,485). Additional focus groups were held in most sites with caregivers of older persons (n = 250 caregivers) and with service providers from the public, voluntary, and commercial sectors (n = 515). No systematic differences in focus group themes were noted between cities in developed and developing countries, although the positive, age-friendly features were more numerous in cities in developed countries. Physical accessibility, service proximity, security, affordability, and inclusiveness were important characteristics everywhere. Based on the recurring issues, a set of core features of an age-friendly city was identified. The Global Age-Friendly Cities Guide and companion "Checklist of Essential Features of Age-Friendly Cities" released by WHO serve as reference for other communities to assess their age readiness and plan change.

摘要

随着城市的发展,城市中老年人的比例也在增加。为了使城市更具“友好老年化”,世界卫生组织(WHO)制定了《全球友好老年化城市指南》和一份配套的《友好老年化城市基本特征清单》。该组织与来自发达国家和发展中国家的 35 个城市的合作伙伴合作,确定了城市生活八个领域的友好老年化特征:户外空间和建筑;交通;住房;社会参与;尊重和社会包容;公民参与和就业;通信和信息;以及社区支持和卫生服务。在 33 个城市中,合作伙伴在当地定义的地理区域内的中低收入地区(n=1485)对 60 岁及以上的人进行了 158 次焦点小组讨论。在大多数城市还与老年人的照顾者(n=250 名照顾者)以及公共、志愿和商业部门的服务提供者(n=515 名服务提供者)进行了焦点小组讨论。尽管发达国家城市的积极、友好特征更多,但在发达国家和发展中国家的城市中,焦点小组主题没有明显的系统性差异。身体无障碍、服务接近、安全、负担能力和包容性是所有地方的重要特征。根据反复出现的问题,确定了一套友好老年化城市的核心特征。WHO 发布的《全球友好老年化城市指南》和配套的《友好老年化城市基本特征清单》为其他社区评估其老年化准备情况和规划变革提供了参考。