Division of Social Sciences, Alfred University, USA.
Med Anthropol Q. 2010 Jun;24(2):137-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2010.01094.x.
Researchers studying infertility from the perspective of anthropology and other the social sciences seldom examine the assumptions embedded in the biomedical definition of infertility. Implicit in the biomedical definition is the assumption that people can be divided straightforwardly into those who are trying to conceive and those who are not trying to conceive. If being infertile implies "intent to conceive," we must recognize that there are various degrees of intent and that the line between the fertile and the infertile is not as sharp as is usually imagined. Drawing on structured interview data collected from a random sample of Midwestern U.S. women and from qualitative interviews, we demonstrate that that there is a wide range of intent among those classified as infertile according to the biomedical definition. We explore the implications of this for research.
研究人员从人类学和其他社会科学的角度研究不孕不育问题时,很少会审视生物医学定义中所隐含的假设。生物医学定义中隐含的假设是,人们可以简单地分为试图怀孕的人和不试图怀孕的人。如果不孕意味着“有意怀孕”,我们必须认识到,意图有不同程度,而且有生育能力的人和不孕的人之间的界限并不像通常想象的那样分明。我们利用从美国中西部随机抽取的女性的结构化访谈数据和定性访谈收集的数据,证明了根据生物医学定义被归类为不孕的人群中存在广泛的意图。我们探讨了这对研究的影响。