Assmann R, Heidelmeyer C F, Trampisch H J, Mottaghy K, Versprille A, Sandmann W, Falke K J
Zentrum für Anaesthesiologie, Universität Düsseldorf, FRG.
Crit Care Med. 1991 Jun;19(6):810-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199106000-00014.
To evaluate strategies for thermodilution-based measurement of cardiac output and right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction and to assess the effects of controlled mechanical ventilation in patients. Furthermore, to compare strategy-associated reproducibility with reference values obtained during long-term apnea.
Crossover trial in patients; reference values from apneic animals.
University ICU and physiology laboratory.
Six consecutive male ICU patients (48 to 70 yrs) after major abdominal vascular surgery.
two adult female sheep.
Three ventilatory rates (8, 16, and 24 cycles/min) and 15-sec periods of apnea were selected for measurements in patients. In animals, continuous apnea was achieved with extracorporeal CO2 removal and apneic oxygenation.
Measurements were performed using an appropriate pulmonary artery catheter and an ejection fraction/cardiac output computer prototype. The thermal indicator was injected automatically at four defined points of the ventilatory cycle, but triggered manually during apnea.
At 8 cycles/min, there was a wide mean range of cyclic variable modulation, with a coefficient of variation of 11.6% and 23.2% for cardiac output and RV ejection fraction, respectively. Allowing for ventilatory phase or changing from 8 to 16 cycles/min reduced errors by half. Combining both procedures resulted in a coefficient of variation of 4.7% and 6.6% for cardiac output and RV ejection fraction, respectively. The best coefficient of variation values obtained during 15 secs of apnea in patients approached those variations in experimental apnea (coefficient of variation of 2.1% and 4.5% for cardiac output and RV ejection fraction, respectively).
At low ventilatory rates, best results are achieved by averaging four phase-selected measurements. One-point measurements were less accurate and random point measurements less reproducible.
评估基于热稀释法测量心输出量和右心室射血分数的策略,并评估控制性机械通气对患者的影响。此外,将策略相关的可重复性与长期呼吸暂停期间获得的参考值进行比较。
患者交叉试验;呼吸暂停动物的参考值。
大学重症监护病房和生理实验室。
6例连续的男性重症监护病房患者(48至70岁),均接受了腹部大血管手术。
2只成年雌性绵羊。
为患者测量选择了三种通气频率(8、16和24次/分钟)以及15秒的呼吸暂停期。在动物中,通过体外二氧化碳清除和呼吸暂停氧合实现持续呼吸暂停。
使用合适的肺动脉导管和射血分数/心输出量计算机原型进行测量。热指示剂在通气周期的四个定义点自动注入,但在呼吸暂停期间手动触发。
在8次/分钟时,循环变量调制的平均范围较宽,心输出量和右心室射血分数的变异系数分别为11.6%和23.2%。考虑通气阶段或从8次/分钟改为16次/分钟可将误差减半。将两种方法结合使用,心输出量和右心室射血分数的变异系数分别为4.7%和6.6%。患者在15秒呼吸暂停期间获得的最佳变异系数值接近实验性呼吸暂停中的变异系数(心输出量和右心室射血分数的变异系数分别为2.1%和4.5%)。
在低通气频率下,通过对四个选定相位的测量进行平均可获得最佳结果。单点测量准确性较低,随机点测量的可重复性较差。