Dambrosio M, Fiore G, Brienza N, Cinnella G, Marucci M, Ranieri V M, Greco M, Brienza A
Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Bari, Policlinico, Bari, Italy.
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Aug;22(8):772-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01709520.
To examine the hemodynamic effects of external positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on right ventricular (RV) function in acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients.
Prospective, with retrospective analysis on the basis of RV volume response to PEEP.
General intensive care unit in a university teaching hospital.
20 mechanically ventilated ARF patients (mean lung injury score = 2.6 +/- 0.45 SD).
Incremental levels of PEEP (0-5-10-15 cmH2O) were applied and RV hemodynamics were studied by means of a Swan-Ganz catheter with a fast-response thermistor for right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) measurement. According to their response to PEEP 15, two groups of patients were defined: group A (9 patients) with unchanged or increased RV end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) and group B (11 patients) with decreased RVEDVI.
At zero PEEP (ZEEP) the hemodynamic parameters of the two groups did not differ. In group A, cardiac index (CI) and stroke volume index (SI) decreased at all PEEP levels (5, 10, and 15 cmH2O), while RVEF started to decrease only at a PEEP of 10 cmH2O (-10.8%), and RVES(systolic)VI increased only at PEEP 15 cmH2O (+21.5%). RVEDVI was not affected by PEEP. In group B, CI and SI decreased at all PEEP levels (5, 10, and 15 cmH2O). Similarly, RVEDVI started to decrease at PEEP 5 cmH2O, while RVESVI decreased only at PEEP 15 cmH2O (-21.4%). RVEF was not affected by PEEP in this group. In each patient the slope of the relationship between RVEDVI and right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI), expressing RV myocardial performance, was studied. This relationship was significant (no change in RV contractility) in 8 of 11 patients in group B and in only 2 patients in group A. In 4 patients in group A, PEEP shifted the RVSWI/RVEDVI ratio rightward in the plot, indicating a decrease in RV myocardial performance in these patients.
PEEP affects RV function in ARF patients. The decrease in cardiac output is more often associated with a preload decrease and no change in RV contractility. On the other hand, the finding of increased RV volumes with PEEP may be associated with a reduction in RV myocardial performance. Thus, these results suggest that assessment of RV function by PEEP and preload recruitable stroke work may disclose otherwise unpredictable alterations in RV function.
研究呼气末正压通气(PEEP)对急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者右心室(RV)功能的血流动力学影响。
前瞻性研究,并基于RV对PEEP的容量反应进行回顾性分析。
大学教学医院的综合重症监护病房。
20例机械通气的ARF患者(平均肺损伤评分=2.6±0.45标准差)。
应用递增水平的PEEP(0 - 5 - 10 - 15 cmH₂O),并通过带有快速响应热敏电阻的Swan - Ganz导管研究RV血流动力学,以测量右心室射血分数(RVEF)。根据患者对15 cmH₂O PEEP的反应,将患者分为两组:A组(9例),RV舒张末期容积指数(RVEDVI)不变或增加;B组(11例),RVEDVI降低。
在零PEEP(ZEEP)时,两组的血流动力学参数无差异。在A组中,所有PEEP水平(5、10和15 cmH₂O)下心脏指数(CI)和每搏量指数(SI)均降低,而RVEF仅在PEEP为10 cmH₂O时开始降低(-10.8%),RVES(收缩期)VI仅在PEEP为15 cmH₂O时增加(+21.5%)。RVEDVI不受PEEP影响。在B组中,所有PEEP水平(5、10和15 cmH₂O)下CI和SI均降低。同样,RVEDVI在PEEP为5 cmH₂O时开始降低,而RVESVI仅在PEEP为15 cmH₂O时降低(-21.4%)。该组中RVEF不受PEEP影响。研究了每位患者中RVEDVI与右心室每搏功指数(RVSWI)之间关系的斜率,以表示RV心肌功能。B组11例患者中有8例这种关系显著(RV收缩性无变化),A组仅2例。A组4例患者中,PEEP使RVSWI/RVEDVI比值在图中向右移动,表明这些患者的RV心肌功能降低。
PEEP影响ARF患者的RV功能。心输出量降低更常与前负荷降低和RV收缩性无变化相关。另一方面,PEEP导致RV容积增加的发现可能与RV心肌功能降低有关。因此,这些结果表明,通过PEEP和可招募前负荷每搏功评估RV功能可能揭示RV功能中其他不可预测的改变。